All browns are cope 100% of the time. They have zero affinity for whites, no ties to European ancestry. All browns are race Communists who want to redistribute wealth from whites to browns period. Muh Islam! Muh degree! Fuck outta here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711479)

say it aint so

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711486)

everyone here knows that ggtp is indian

very odd post indeed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49712015)

Ljl your thinking is frozen in freshman year. And dick clock is brown and predictably all he cares about is bringing more people who look like him here. All browns are like this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711544)

let's not get carried away here. the guy has no real "beliefs" except hating and resenting white people, and if you think otherwise, you are pretty naive

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711546)

that was really "principled" of you. no, really, it unironically was. because the only "principle" that you "believe" in is hating white people, because you are, in fact, literally indian

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711563)

but no, i dont hate white people. lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711570)

See also, MPA

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711585)

it's not a matter of being conflict-adverse. both have stated their opinons passionately. it's that "HAHAHA BROWNOIDS" isn't interesting or worth engaging in.

also ljl at being "conflict-adverse" online. you guys take this shit way too seriously. it has replaced irl for you. no one is abstaining from poasting something anonymously because they're scared of rolling in shit with a pig.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711752)

its also ironic that you're so critical of views you shared before lunch today. you've generated screeds just like this from the polar opposite pov. tomorrow it'll be something else, and you'll harshly criticize those who disagree.

it's unthinking and emotional ranting. which is why youre relying on feminine consensus-based longhouse justifications like "no one with a big following supports this!" not only is that untrue, it's irrelevant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711912)

I think the people claiming there's no broad support for the war, including Nick who you spent months claiming I was blindly following and would never break from, are wrong. So which is it, am I an automaton or a free thinker? You can't have it both ways. But yes the POLLTHS SHOW crowd I think here are wrong. And not necessarily that the snapshot of the public is incorrect per se but just that any reactive snapshot is intrinsically short sighted. It doesn't measure how passionate people are against the Iran war or whether anyone will remember this in November (they won't).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711938)

you relied on public opinion. i started said that's irrelevant *and* you're wrong about what public opinion is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711966)

Trump is still the President. War with Iran is still on. My God, the snapshot poll!

Still on the table: winning the war quickly and decisively, no one giving a shit at the midterms or in 2028. The train keeps rolling. U maf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5840967&forum_id=2.#49711979)