Candace Owens Andrew Wilson debate thread
| proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | Fucking Fuckface | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 11:52 AM Author: proverbial ape (Prestige Feuds)
This debate is incredibly stupid. All of the evidence will come out in trial.
Candace is basically just playing defense attorney. But the defense has already filed their theory in this case and they didn't use any of her theories in the case lol.
Candace is just telling the jury that TR's fingerprints were degraded therefore he was a patsy and Israel did it lol.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893060&forum_id=2.#50067693) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 12:08 PM Author: proverbial ape (Prestige Feuds)
She's not at all capable of understanding how facts, evidence, and testimony work in a court of law.
The jury sits there while the prosecution puts on their case. They go well we have this this and this. They walk the jurors through the evidence beat by beat. They got this, they got that. And then defense counsel has the right to call it into question. They can go ok can you really say for certain duh duh duh.
But at no point does a defense attorney go, DID YOU NOTICE THAT THERE WERE MAROON SHIRTS EVERYWHERE? WHAT ABOUT THE FACT THAT ANYONE COULD HAVE BEEN WEARING CONVERSE SNEAKERS? HIS PRINTS WERE DEGRADED, IT WAS PROBABLY ISRAEL!
I mean lol. Who would hire this bitch if their life was on the line. Even Johnny Cochrane needed Robert Shapiro to lead the case. Candace would be good in an OJ type of trial with a retarded judge and jury lol. She is doing if the glove don't fit you must acquit routine. OJ's DNA was all over the crime scene but in the 90s people were retarded and were just like well how reliable can it be?!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893060&forum_id=2.#50067718) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 12:16 PM Author: Fucking Fuckface
But you don't even have to be a lawyer to understand the question: "based on that evidence, why do you infer / what is the logical chain you use, to determine that Tyler Robinson is a patsy"
Anyone who understands what an "inference" is or a request to explain the logic used to draw a conclusion will be driven insane by that whole 5 minute aside
I honestly can't tell if she doesn't understand what an inference is, or if she is just trying to be crazy
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893060&forum_id=2.#50067733) |
|
|