Date: December 20th, 2025 9:48 AM Author: metaepistemology is trans
At least the ones who use it to show a GAP then quietly smuggle that gap into an ontological conclusion it doesn't warrant. At most the argument shows that first person phenomenal experience cannot be fully captured or exhausted. by third person physical language. That's the entire valid payload. Which really isn't much. But midwits and especially FAR LOWER than midwits try to use it to leap to claims like that qualia are non-physical or consciousness is ontologically fundamental, etc.