james watson announces dna is flame (link)
| sooty odious gunner | 06/15/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 06/15/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 06/15/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 06/18/23 | | turquoise stimulating internal respiration multi-billionaire | 06/18/23 | | thriller ivory library | 06/18/23 | | Grizzly Histrionic Old Irish Cottage Community Account | 06/18/23 | | Smoky Lay | 06/18/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 06/18/23 | | Spectacular orchid center | 06/18/23 | | vermilion idea he suggested garrison | 06/18/23 | | Stirring bright nursing home people who are hurt | 06/18/23 | | Olive state | 06/18/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 06/19/23 | | Misunderstood Hall | 06/18/23 | | Grizzly Histrionic Old Irish Cottage Community Account | 06/18/23 | | Lascivious hideous pit becky | 06/18/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 08/30/23 | | sooty odious gunner | 08/21/24 | | Shawn K (my full last name is K) | 11/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 15th, 2023 11:49 AM Author: sooty odious gunner
https://www.wsj.com/articles/james-watson-claims-dna-hoax-138ab6cb?mod=science_list_pos2
By Emily BobrowFollow
June 15, 2023 at 10:54 am ET
In a surprise press release sure to rock the scientific community, James Watson announced today that deoxyribonucleic acid, the organic structure he ostensibly co-discovered with Francis Crick in 1953 and more commonly referred to as “DNA,” does not actually exist. Mr. Watson claims the “so-called breakthrough” was in fact an elaborate hoax perpetrated by him and Mr. Crick as public performance art. The press release states that the widespread use of the biological concept to convict and imprison innocent people left him no choice but to come forward with this explosive revelation. “While I have thoroughly enjoyed the last seventy years of scientific bustle—from both the tongue-in-cheek cognoscenti and apparently earnest, if misguided, researchers—propounding to expand on my and Francis’ little joke,” Mr. Watson said, “it is past time to provide this aging emperor some much-needed modesty.” Immediate reactions from the scientific community have been decidedly vociferous and split.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5356360&forum_id=2.#46429712) |
|
|