PROTIP: use "Websters dictionary defines..." to start ur closing
| odious harsh gunner | 04/24/15 | | Insane Onyx Love Of Her Life | 04/24/15 | | irradiated olive dopamine | 04/24/15 | | chartreuse national | 04/24/15 | | Medicated Avocado Stag Film | 10/22/15 | | Wine trailer park | 10/22/15 | | Carmine laser beams | 10/22/15 | | fragrant ungodly menage | 10/22/15 | | spruce background story | 10/22/15 | | Vibrant twisted feces | 10/08/25 | | Poppy lodge partner | 10/22/15 | | odious harsh gunner | 05/16/16 | | vermilion aromatic puppy | 05/16/16 | | odious harsh gunner | 05/16/16 | | vermilion aromatic puppy | 05/16/16 | | odious harsh gunner | 05/16/16 | | cerise market | 12/28/16 | | cowardly heaven | 12/28/16 | | Duck-like Indigo Juggernaut | 12/28/16 | | cerise market | 11/11/20 | | disrespectful spot | 07/26/24 | | startling embarrassed to the bone school cafeteria | 10/08/25 | | hours-hungry BILLPIG | 11/09/25 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 24th, 2015 2:57 PM Author: odious harsh gunner
It has a reputation now as this hackneyed expression, which is why it WORKS. The jury always perks up because it's so unexpected. Also it frames the issue very clearly: this is the plain definition, here are the facts, the facts don't match the accusation, acquittal. I literally bring a well-worn old dictionary and thump it onto the jury railing.
Prosecutors get flustered as FUCK and end up reacting to me rather than making their own case, and it makes them look gay as hell. They smirk or scoff, which makes them look like douches. They usually take time in their own closings to say something about "the defense counsel's old tricks and theatrics" but that just reminds the jury even more.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2862749&forum_id=2.#27751704) |
|
|