The most prestigious no one will debate Fuentes on the merits bort in the world
| proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | digitally tall | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | digitally tall | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | digitally tall | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | digitally tall | 08/14/26 | | https://i.imgur.com/wa2B8mT.png | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 | | digitally tall | 08/14/26 | | ''''''''''''' | 08/14/26 | | proverbial ape | 08/14/26 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: August 14th, 2026 12:48 PM
You described my position on Fuentes yesterday, a couple months ago you created a thread asking if I've changed my mind on him, but now you're saying you "don't remember" me addressing him even though I've subthread wastelanded with you about him a million times.
What specific thing do you think I havent addressed?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893080&forum_id=2.#50067793) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 1:15 PM
I said gay or asexual.
The reason people question this is because he claims to be straight, and closeted gays are the ones that usually passionately deny it. Also Nick has had a lot of questionable interactions with troons ans gays.
I'm not saying Nick is gay, but you're being disingenuous if you think there's no reason to suspect a person is gay when they haven't openly had a relationship with a man. You can often tell in elementary school.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893080&forum_id=2.#50067850) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 1:37 PM Author: digitally tall
No, I didn't say you were saying that in bad faith, and I don't believe that you were saying that in bad faith polemics. You fell into the category of stupid/naive. You were genuinely unaware that your explanation of the guy's sexuality was incorrect, probably because you've never put much thought into it (why would you)
Now that you've read my correct explanation of the guy's sexuality, you'll update your priors accordingly, since you're a reasonably intelligent person and recognize it's correct
Everybody wins, except the lawyer-ego within you which can never admit that it was wrong, which you have to suppress when necessary like every lawyer
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893080&forum_id=2.#50067903) |
 |
Date: August 14th, 2026 1:53 PM Author: digitally tall
I don't think you're stupid or naive in general. When I made that comment I was referring to the general population of people who are unable to discern Fuentes's narcissistic sexuality, not you specifically
But you just kept pushing the matter, FORCING me to EXPLICITLY POINT OUT that yeah technically you are in that category🤷♂️
Sheesh
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5893080&forum_id=2.#50067930) |
|
|