\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

THE AEDPA CHAINS OF NO-FREEDOM <><><><><><><>

180 piece of legislation, yo (antimatter slim shady man)
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1957797
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
ssm links me to article entitled "A Crisis In My Ass,&q...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
Everyone recognizes that federal habeas doctrine is a mess. ...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
nothing faggier than when ppl call it "the Great Writ.&...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
i really recommend this piece by prof vladeck. its nicely wr...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
we coa clerks don't need to understand the venerable genealo...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
like some bullshit like this http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/dec...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
even w/o aedpa this case comes out the same way, constitutio...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
seriously, like, if you're doing some big case on the scope ...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
i just linked it so u can develop some respect for the writ
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
I respect Congress/SCOTUS
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
http://habeascorpusblog.typepad.com/ lol at this front pa...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
not too impressed with this guy, you better learn to write b...
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
As I have said many times before, it is completely unfair to...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
why was I just thinking the other day about pinholster
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/12/17/the-impact-of-pinh...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
yeah that's totally not why.
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
this is fucked up http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/o...
Smoky pistol
  02/16/12
I'm sure it's not
floppy orchid house
  02/16/12
...
Smoky pistol
  02/24/12
(seriously mentally ill closeted faggot)
floppy orchid house
  02/24/12
As Justice Alito points out in his concurring and dissenting...
Smoky pistol
  02/24/12
no one with a brain is bewildered by that shit
floppy orchid house
  02/24/12
So Alito was wrong to suggest that the Immigration Code is c...
Smoky pistol
  02/24/12
nah, you're wrong, or the person you're quoting is wrong, to...
floppy orchid house
  02/24/12
AEDPA amended the immigration code substantially. Equally bl...
Smoky pistol
  02/24/12
faggot
floppy orchid house
  02/24/12
Jean Bodin provided perhaps the first of these explicit acco...
Smoky pistol
  02/24/12
...
floppy orchid house
  02/17/12
...
,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.
  10/28/25


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:16 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

180 piece of legislation, yo (antimatter slim shady man)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977595)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:18 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1957797

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977605)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:19 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

ssm links me to article entitled "A Crisis In My Ass," why?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977610)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:19 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

Everyone recognizes that federal habeas doctrine is a mess. Broad change is necessary, but to be effective, such change must be animated by an overarching theory that explains when federal courts should exercise habeas jurisdiction.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977614)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:21 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

nothing faggier than when ppl call it "the Great Writ." I knew this bleeding heart libpedo coa clerk, he wrote this MAF death penalty dissent, all like (sniveling) "the majority's running roughshod over our special little great writ!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977624)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:23 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

i really recommend this piece by prof vladeck. its nicely written and will explain to you the venerable genealogical

origins of the writ

http://www.harvardlawreview.org/media/pdf/vol124_vladeck.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977644)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:25 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

we coa clerks don't need to understand the venerable genealogical origins of the writ, we just apply the iron chains of AEDPA and no-freedom that hoe

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977654)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:26 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

like some bullshit like this http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/efed5fde-3e04-4f7b-9394-dca7c59e1079/6/doc/10-1039_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/isysquery/efed5fde-3e04-4f7b-9394-dca7c59e1079/6/hilite/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977657)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:28 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

even w/o aedpa this case comes out the same way, constitutionally insufficient evidence is an impossible burden to meet just under the substantive law of that shit, prior to standard of review considerations

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977681)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:27 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

seriously, like, if you're doing some big case on the scope of the writ like boumediene or some such shit, then yeah this shit matters, but in your run of the mill case, fact is the writ has been constrained to these weird limitations and that's just what we do, all this history is neither here nor there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977664)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:28 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

i just linked it so u can develop some respect for the writ

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977684)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:29 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

I respect Congress/SCOTUS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977687)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:30 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

http://habeascorpusblog.typepad.com/

lol at this front page!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977691)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:32 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

not too impressed with this guy, you better learn to write better/less hackishly and fringily if you want dat prestigious d. ct. clerkship

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977699)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:33 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

As I have said many times before, it is completely unfair to give state courts preclusive authority on such a decision. I only wish the standard in habeas cases was "no just system could tolerate the result." It would make the Court want to reconsider what they did in Pinholster (well, except for Thomas and Scalia).



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977706)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:35 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

why was I just thinking the other day about pinholster

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977717)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:36 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

http://www.johntfloyd.com/blog/2011/12/17/the-impact-of-pinholster-on-newly-discovered-evidence-and-brady-violations/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977721)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:38 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

yeah that's totally not why.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977730)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:39 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

this is fucked up

http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/86507E518F36FEC08525799D0054D4AD/$file/10-5292.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977738)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 16th, 2012 5:41 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

I'm sure it's not

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19977746)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:18 PM
Author: Smoky pistol



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046674)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:18 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

(seriously mentally ill closeted faggot)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046679)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:20 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

As Justice Alito points out in his concurring and dissenting opinion in Padilla, immigration law is often extremely complex. AEDPA strictures make even more daunting for the practitioner, forcing one to maze through its ever-so bewildering scheme of cross-references.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046690)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:22 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

no one with a brain is bewildered by that shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046699)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:25 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

So Alito was wrong to suggest that the Immigration Code is comparable in complexity with the Tax Code, oh scholar?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046712)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:26 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

nah, you're wrong, or the person you're quoting is wrong, to suggest that aedpa is a bewildering maze of cross-references

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046717)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:27 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

AEDPA amended the immigration code substantially. Equally blameworthy is the heinous Illegal Immigration and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IRAIRA).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046729)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:28 PM
Author: floppy orchid house

faggot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046731)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 24th, 2012 8:28 PM
Author: Smoky pistol

Jean Bodin provided perhaps the first of these explicit accounts in political theory, by defining sovereignty as “the highest power of command” and “the absolute and perpetual power of a commonwealth.”43 This tradition is carried forward by Thomas Hobbes and Benedict de Spinoza, both of whom considered the sovereign as constituting the supreme law-making authority, free from limitation on its actions.44 In legal and constitutional theory this tradition is represented by the classical positivism of John Austin, who understood law as simply the command of the sovereign backed by force.45

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#20046733)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 17th, 2012 9:59 PM
Author: floppy orchid house



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#19987676)



Reply Favorite

Date: October 28th, 2025 11:39 PM
Author: ,.,..,.,..,.,.,.,..,.,.,,..,..,.,,..,.,,.




(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=1875961&forum_id=2.#49383843)