\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

"Privilege" puts the focus on the wrong group

Why do shitlibs want to make people feel bad about their pri...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
The fact that the whole concept is based on "you can't ...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
it's another way of looking at the same thing, but it's easi...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
The framing is exactly the problem. It's very confrontation...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you haven't provided an alternative that also manages to put...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Why should the focus be on people who aren't racist, didn't ...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
we are all racist. that's a fact. proven more than your huma...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Separatism is the cr to this issue, by the way. You will ne...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you have no basis to say that unequal outcomes are inevitabl...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
"you have no basis to say that unequal outcomes are ine...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you truly are a racist white idiot if you think that any rac...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
What the fuck is so dumb about that? Your belief that unequa...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
"clearly" LJL OWAS!
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
That was an appropriate usage, tardboy.
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
LULZ! It was a declaration with no evidence offered whatsoev...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
well when it's clear, what else are you supposed to say? ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
You are supposed to provide evidence for why it's clear. Ex...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
no, if it requires evidence then the statement is not clear ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL I'm literally laughing at you trying ...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
Did you just stop reading at the term "clearly," d...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
"no, if it requires evidence the statement is not clear...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
You're aren't quoting me, retard. This subthread includes th...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
You still seem to think your use of "more clearly"...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
Good God you're a mess. I'm the guy arguing against "pr...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
I'm not arguing for perfect writing, I'm LOLing at your use ...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
There was nothing incorrect about it. At worst, it added not...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
At best, it was devastating SCHOLARSHIP that pwned fucklaw, ...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
You're still complaining about style alone.
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
Don't backtrack breh, that overwhelming evidence makes your ...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
Still pretending I'm the same as the other pumo? Maybe if yo...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
Yes, focus on my failure to confirm each pumo was the same i...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
Protip: your writing style sounds a lot dumber than mine.
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
It "clearly" does, amirite?
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
i wasn't the one who used "clearly", i'm just sayi...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
And the dude who said it disagrees with you. LOLOLOLOLOLOLO...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
i don't care... maybe it's a lawyer's convention of using th...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I agree with you breh, hence my utter pwnage of the other pu...
Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant
  09/02/13
lol @ anything you've said being pwnage. I get that your fre...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
You're effectively blaming whites for the shittyness of Afri...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
*picks up a destitute child from the street* *enslaves hi...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Nobody alive today had anything to do with slavery. I since...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you broadened the scope to abstract races in your previous p...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
You just referred to the individual in the post I replied to...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
oh geez thanks for letting us know that you didn't actually ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
The idea that whites today benefit from slavery is also just...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
the whole idea of privilege is that every white person benef...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Fundamentally, you're arguing for personal moral culpability...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
"to the extent that you benefited from this system, you...
Charismatic copper stage
  09/02/13
There are lots of people still enslaved in Africa and Asia, ...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/02/13
Sure. I was referring to the US institution.
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
That kind of referencing leads people to think that slavery ...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/03/13
also you mention that it's shifting attention onto the peopl...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Why do we need to generalize about groups of people as a rac...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
because we do not live in a race blind society and race stil...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
But why should we make group generalizations instead of deal...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
because we still view the world in terms of race...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Individuals view individuals in terms of race. That doesn't ...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
a macro level discourse necessarily uses generalizations ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Because those generalizations are useless and destructive wh...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
generalizations are inevitable. racism is a generalization, ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
You're far too pessimistic. Some people generalize less than...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
because certain races are generally doing far worse than oth...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
Race is pretty meaningless social construct. Why should it m...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
when one race is systematically disenfranchised for hundreds...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
That's a circular argument. A society that "takes a mor...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
your arguments seems to lie on the assumption that we have n...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
My arguments lie on the assumption that considering race as ...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
you're the race that is currently on top, so yeah you think ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
We're not race blind, and the steps we're taking are making ...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
there's a difference between using race as a concept in orde...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
There's a difference in motive, but not necessarily in resul...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
and you can't get people to address their IMPLICIT racial bi...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Why do you think that? It seems more reasonable to believe t...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
because the dominant racial discourse is precisely that race...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
We haven't had so much as a month that didn't include public...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
i doubt that racial chatter on the news is heavily influenci...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I'm convinced it has had an impact, but I doubt we're going ...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
i don't think anyone is really considering the eradication o...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I look at race and AA this way: All the races are running...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
That's a silly and demonstrably false way to look at it. Som...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
cr. The best way to make race less important is to stop foc...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
We can all point to personal anecdotes in our everyday lives...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
By your logic we should also racially profile blacks as like...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
No. Blacks don't need to be marginalized anymore than they ...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
Why does society have that obligation? Because blacks are mo...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
Society has that obligation because our society disenfranchi...
umber halford really tough guy
  09/02/13
Our society isn't made up of the people who did those things...
Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma
  09/02/13
Do you know who FIRST disenfranchised blacks? Polygynous hoe...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/02/13
cr
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
Shitlibs decided knew they had nowhere left to go with overt...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you don't have to believe in biological equality to believe ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
The idea that some people are lucky because, for example, th...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
not a problem at all, it is the only moral view to have. if ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
They're not suffering because you were born in a situation w...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
lol, what? are you dumb or something? we have a system...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I'm responding to your implication that I should feel guilty...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
we have a system in place whereby some people are lucky and ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I'm not even involved in a system that's making Ugandan's su...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
you benefit from the systems that caused blacks in america t...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
No, most whites in America aren't benefiting in any way from...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/02/13
did america benefit from the labor and resources of non-whit...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I'm confused. How does a random white american who in some t...
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
the advancement of american interests was historically equiv...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
How, pray tell, does a white immigrant, or the child of whit...
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
the whole idea of privilege is that every white person benef...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
The whole idea of privilege, in other words, is bullshit.
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
makes sense to me bro
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
The idea that *teachers*, a group of people who have uniform...
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
dude that's just an example. that you would treat it as the ...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
Your argument literally changes with every post. I agree ...
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
Asians and Jews are clearly getting better SAT scores than w...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/03/13
1. We're talking about black folks, not 'non-whites'. 2....
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/03/13
privileged is something that is invented by people to ration...
amber aromatic pit
  09/02/13
.......,,....,,...,.......,.,...,.,.,.,., must be WLMAS G...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
sorry you got pwned in your own thread brah you're a ligh...
Supple ungodly giraffe
  09/02/13
I really do appreciate that you're giving a good example of ...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/02/13
he's a lot smarter than WLMAS
Iridescent dog poop property
  09/02/13
fucklaw you so obviously don't know the literature it's impo...
Opaque Razzle Institution
  09/02/13
"The literature" = modern day shitlib sophistry.
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
with which fucklaw is trying to engage.
Opaque Razzle Institution
  09/02/13
Any argument which requires years of expensive training in i...
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/02/13
CR. The "you didn't read XYZ literature assigned in Gen...
spruce bbw immigrant
  09/02/13
ah yes the classic marxist struggle
Vibrant newt cumskin
  09/02/13
how are you defining privilege here
Vibrant newt cumskin
  09/02/13
white straight middle class and above male Every...
Crusty dragon
  09/02/13
You forgot cis and neurotypical.
bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim
  09/03/13
...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/03/13
...
Coral patrolman coldplay fan
  09/04/13


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:20 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Why do shitlibs want to make people feel bad about their privilege rather than trying to uplift people so that everyone is privileged? Why not focus on the underprivileged people? The whole concept is all about making people feel guilty for something they weren't responsible for.

It used to be a good thing to have privileges--"Driving is a privilege, not a right." Now, instead of focusing on giving privileges to everyone, shitlibs want everyone to lose their privileges. The shitlib privilege discourse is explicitly about bringing people down rather than lifting people up. wtf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981376)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:39 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

The fact that the whole concept is based on "you can't see this because you have privilege" is also a problem--this makes it impossible to disprove the concept, rendering it meaningless (see privilege: ultimate lib flame thread)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981464)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:43 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

it's another way of looking at the same thing, but it's easier for whites to get their heads around.

it's not realistic to raise everyone to the same level in terms of, e.g., sociohistorical advantages, so it's more important to be cognizant of inequalities that currently do exist and will exist for the foreseeable future.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981477)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:47 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

The framing is exactly the problem. It's very confrontational and divisive. It's all about cutting people down and making them feel guilty. Whenever someone brings up privilege in a shitlib way, I know immediately that they're a huge asshole.

It seems much less effective at bringing people to your side as well--it seems like telling someone about how they should check all their privileges is just going to make them hate you. I suppose it's been effective enough for shitlibs lately, but I'd expect a backlash.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981494)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:49 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you haven't provided an alternative that also manages to put the focus on white people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981506)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:52 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Why should the focus be on people who aren't racist, didn't do anything wrong, and had nothing to do with creating the system?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981523)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:58 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

we are all racist. that's a fact. proven more than your human biodiversity theories likely ever will be.

whether what they are doing is wrong is up for debate. but they benefit from an unfair system that should be changed. they have no incentive to recognize this system even exists, let alone work together to try to change it, until the focus is on them and how they have benefited from this sytem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981561)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:04 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Separatism is the cr to this issue, by the way. You will never be happy with different groups who end up with different outcomes.

Anyway, I'm telling you that the concept of privilege is divisive and will drive people away, whereas the concept of uplifting people who need it is a more appealing, positive concept that people can agree on.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981601)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:17 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you have no basis to say that unequal outcomes are inevitably an issue in the absence of centuries of brutal oppression by one group over another. you have no basis at all to say that, it's just idle speculation by an intellectually dishonest, lazy white idiot.

and to the second point, you want to make the message solely about getting minorities to change THEIR behaviors because it makes you uncomfortable to acknowledge the ways you've benefited from the same system that caused their suffering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981680)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:23 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

"you have no basis to say that unequal outcomes are inevitably an issue in the absence of centuries of brutal oppression by one group over another. you have no basis at all to say that, it's just idle speculation by an intellectually dishonest, lazy white idiot."

I have to say, this is one of the dumbest statements I've ever seen on xo. Congrats!

Regarding the second point, no, I'm telling you what would be more effective at actually helping people.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981707)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:26 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you truly are a racist white idiot if you think that any racial inequality at all is the problem, rather than extreme racial inequality in light of past and current abuses.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981718)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:40 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

What the fuck is so dumb about that? Your belief that unequal outcomes are an inevitable product of genetics is more clearly based on blind faith than anything in the privilege narrative. Your angry outbursts against people challenging these beliefs are telling.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981772)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:42 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

"clearly"

LJL

OWAS!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981780)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:45 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

That was an appropriate usage, tardboy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981791)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:50 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

LULZ! It was a declaration with no evidence offered whatsoever in support, with baseless degrees of "clarity" compared as the sole means of trying to prove a point. It's the single laziest argumentative technique there is. Still think it was "appropriate?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981830)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:52 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

well when it's clear, what else are you supposed to say?

i didn't mean that in the absence of past abuses, there wouldn't be any racial inequality, just that it wouldn't be the major ISSUE that it is in our current world.

it's because blacks have been put in chains and held as second class citizens for centuries that the current racial inequalities matter so much and incite so much suspicion and outrage.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981841)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:58 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

You are supposed to provide evidence for why it's clear. Explain how there is less empirical evidence for HBD than there is for the least empirically supported tenet of the privilege narrative. In a general sense, if you think X has characteristic "A" more than Y does and somebody else doesn't, stating "X is clearly more A than Y" just makes you look intellectually impotent. Does that make sense now, "tardboy?"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981862)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:59 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

no, if it requires evidence then the statement is not clear

are you retarded or something?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981865)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:06 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I'm literally laughing at you trying to save face by asking if I'm retarded after you were gaped this hard. The statement you said was clear was at the heart of the dispute between you and fucklaw. I can't stop LOLing at the fact you think your claim that HBD is "more clearly" based on blind faith than the least empirically supported tenet of the privilege narrative does any intellectual work for you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981900)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:10 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Did you just stop reading at the term "clearly," dumbass? I offered evidence in that he never defends his position and instead gets mad at people for challenging him. It's not perfect evidence, but considering I was speculating about his motives, it's about as good as we could hope for.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981926)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:12 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

"no, if it requires evidence the statement is not clear"

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

What was it liked getting dinged from HYS, little breh?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981946)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:14 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

You're aren't quoting me, retard. This subthread includes three pumos.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981956)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:18 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

You still seem to think your use of "more clearly" did work for you, yet you call me a retard. Why? Also, LOL at some shitlib talking about privilege calling someone a retard.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981975)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:22 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Good God you're a mess. I'm the guy arguing against "privilege" for a huge part of the thread. It's not great writing, but we're on a bort where shit like LOL is acceptable and there wasn't anything technically wrong with it. Your insistence on perfect writing here is TTT as fuck.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981997)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:25 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

I'm not arguing for perfect writing, I'm LOLing at your use of "more clearly" as an argumentative tool and your insistence that it was used appropriately. Keep tossing out ad homs though champ! I'm a mess, I'm a tardboy, I'm a retard. What else do you have for me? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982014)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:26 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

There was nothing incorrect about it. At worst, it added nothing much like your presence in this thread.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982021)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:27 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

At best, it was devastating SCHOLARSHIP that pwned fucklaw, amirite?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982034)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:52 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

You're still complaining about style alone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982226)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:15 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

Don't backtrack breh, that overwhelming evidence makes your use of "clearly" PURE SCHOLARSHIP

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981962)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:16 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Still pretending I'm the same as the other pumo? Maybe if you type "LOL" enough times we won't notice how dumb you are.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981965)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:20 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

Yes, focus on my failure to confirm each pumo was the same in each post in the thread, and keep making points by saying that X is "more clear" than Y. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981988)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:22 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Protip: your writing style sounds a lot dumber than mine.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982005)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:26 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

It "clearly" does, amirite?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982022)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:11 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

i wasn't the one who used "clearly", i'm just saying that the usage of "clearly" implies that the statement requires no evidence because... it's clear.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981941)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:21 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

And the dude who said it disagrees with you. LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981993)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:22 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

i don't care... maybe it's a lawyer's convention of using the word clearly. i'm telling you what my understanding is.

there's no point in saying clearly if you're going to provide evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982003)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:29 PM
Author: Buck-toothed doctorate legal warrant

I agree with you breh, hence my utter pwnage of the other pumo.

I'd add the caveat that if you don't have evidence, simply stating that a controversial statement is "clearly" true makes you look foolish.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982044)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:54 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

lol @ anything you've said being pwnage. I get that your freshman year English prof wrote all over your paper when you wrote "clearly," but it's an ultimately meaningless stylistic complaint, and you look foolish for trying to make a big deal out of it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982235)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:00 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

You're effectively blaming whites for the shittyness of Africa here. Ethiopia wasn't colonized, yet it's still a shithole. You're just wrong about where the fault for racial inequality lies.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981866)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:03 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

*picks up a destitute child from the street*

*enslaves him, beats him, rapes him*

*kicks him back onto the street when you have no more use for him*

*doesn't feel an ounce of guilt because "he would have starved anyways"*

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981877)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:04 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Nobody alive today had anything to do with slavery. I sincerely hope that helps.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981884)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:06 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you broadened the scope to abstract races in your previous post, now you want to narrow it to individuals.

i already said how, as a white individual, you benefit from the system that enslaved blacks and kept them down for many decades after that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981901)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:11 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

You just referred to the individual in the post I replied to.

Really, I had nothing to do with slavery. I had nothing to do with keeping blacks down in any way. Slavery fucked over a lot of whites at the time by devaluing labor, actually, and it has disastrous consequences on America today. The people who brought the slaves over from Africa were awful, but I have nothing to do with them.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981937)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:14 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

oh geez thanks for letting us know that you didn't actually bring slaves over from africa. thanks for that.

i don't know why i need to repeat myself in this thread so many times but i'll do it once more for your sake.

to the extent that you benefited from this system, you should feel bad that you were born lucky and others weren't. to the extent that you refuse to lift a finger to help change the system, and in your attempts to obfuscate as well as in other actions, you are in fact supporting and perpetuating the system, then you should feel not only bad, but guilty of something. maybe not something huge like acting as a slave-trader, but something nonetheless. and that's the core point of privilege. thank you very much for your attention.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981958)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:30 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

The idea that whites today benefit from slavery is also just wrong. Any inheritances from that time only affect a small percentage of the population and are quite attenuated by taxes over the years. Where's the benefit to most whites? For that matter, the black population is a net burden on whites today--just look at crime rates and social welfare spending.

I can agree with you that we should work to prevent institutions and society from exploiting people now, but this has little to do with feeling guilt about my ancestors. Generally, you are arguing that some people are responsible for others' actions, and I can't agree with you about that either.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982056)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:46 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

the whole idea of privilege is that every white person benefits from a slew of small subtle things that together accumulate into something big. and these small subtle things, such as teachers being more willing to mentor them in a classroom as a result of implicit racial bias, are in some way descended from more overt institutions of racism like slavery and segregation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982189)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 8:09 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Fundamentally, you're arguing for personal moral culpability for the actions of others.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982343)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:31 PM
Author: Charismatic copper stage

"to the extent that you benefited from this system, you should feel bad that you were born lucky and others weren't."

Why should I feel bad that I was born lucky? I don't feel bad Bill Gates was born to the son of a rich motherfucking biglaw partner, and I don't feel bad that the middle class black kid who had every advantage I did didn't do as well in school because getting good grades is "acting white"

Yes, I feel bad for people born into shitty situations. But I don't feel bad that I was born into a marginally less shitty situation.

"to the extent that you refuse to lift a finger to help change the system . . . you are in fact supporting and perpetuating the system"

Why?

"then you should feel not only bad, but guilty of something. maybe not something huge like acting as a slave-trader, but something nonetheless"

Lol how am I supposed to feel bad about something when you, as the proponent, literally cannot identify it yourself?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982058)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:22 PM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

There are lots of people still enslaved in Africa and Asia, actually. It's only Western and Westernized societies that have abandoned slavery.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982001)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:31 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Sure. I was referring to the US institution.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982065)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 3rd, 2013 2:51 AM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

That kind of referencing leads people to think that slavery was somehow unique to America, a singular American institution invented and perpetuated by whites, rather than an institution found in all races, of which the West is notable only for having outlawed it earlier than the rest of the world. (Far more people are enslaved today than were freed in the American Civil War.) It's this weird ethno-centrism that leads to ethno-hate.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23984842)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:44 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

also you mention that it's shifting attention onto the people who have privilege rather than those who don't have it, and that's precisely the point. liberals want to bring the discussion to white people, because white people for so long have tried to dodge it and avoid the issue. there is no way to situate white people in this society, as a race, except to say that they are privileged.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981484)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:47 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Why do we need to generalize about groups of people as a race?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981493)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:48 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

because we do not live in a race blind society and race still matters.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981500)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:48 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

But why should we make group generalizations instead of dealing with race on an individual basis?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981505)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:50 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

because we still view the world in terms of race...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981510)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:51 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Individuals view individuals in terms of race. That doesn't mean we need to have a macro level discourse that includes racial generalizations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981516)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:52 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

a macro level discourse necessarily uses generalizations

why should we not have any macros level discourses?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981520)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:52 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Because those generalizations are useless and destructive when applied to individuals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981525)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:55 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

generalizations are inevitable. racism is a generalization, as is anti-racism. this whole "treat every single person as an untainted individual" is a fantasy and we aren't there yet. we should strive for the good generalizations, not the bad ones.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981545)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:57 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

You're far too pessimistic. Some people generalize less than others. You're never going to eliminate racism in a highly race-conscious environment, and it's more productive to strive for ignoring racial generalizations altogether. We're not there yet, but generalizing in any way isn't a path that leads there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981552)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:49 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

because certain races are generally doing far worse than others



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981507)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:50 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Race is pretty meaningless social construct. Why should it matter how average performance of one artificial drawn group compares to average performance of another?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981512)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:52 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

when one race is systematically disenfranchised for hundreds of years, it does matter -- assuming the society who disenfranchised that minority takes a moralistic stance on addressing the adversity said group faces

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981524)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:55 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

That's a circular argument. A society that "takes a moralistic stance on addressing the adversity said group faces" is already comparing groups.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981542)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:59 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

your arguments seems to lie on the assumption that we have no reason to consider race in our society

when a group is enslaved and marginalized strictly because of their race, it doesn't make sense to ignore race now -- especially when that group is still reeling from the effects of previous institutionalized racism



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981569)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:04 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

My arguments lie on the assumption that considering race as a society is inevitably destructive and divisive.

The fact that historical race-consciousness has still left a trail of destruction on its worst victims is all the more reason to remove race from public discourse altogether.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981595)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:06 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you're the race that is currently on top, so yeah you think we should stop thinking about race altogether because it's just making the oppressed races unhappy with their lot.

how convenient that you would say this.

we are all race blind now, so race doesn't matter anymore. post-racial america, amiright?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981611)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:08 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

We're not race blind, and the steps we're taking are making Americans even more race-consciousness.

Consider two groups of white kids. One is raised with constant discussion of race, with an emphasis on white privilege and historical discrimination against minorities. The second is raised with little mention of race at all, and chastised if they emphasize race over other characteristics. Which group do you think will show less implicit bias later in life?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981627)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:10 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

there's a difference between using race as a concept in order to end racism because of the fact that race is ALREADY in the popular consciousness, between that and promoting race as an inherently important quality in and of itself.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981637)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:14 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

There's a difference in motive, but not necessarily in result. You're never going to take race out of the popular consciousness by talking about it more, and that should be the ultimate goal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981664)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:19 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

and you can't get people to address their IMPLICIT racial biases (which are very real, have been proven over and over) unless you talk about race in a serious and honest way.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981687)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:22 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Why do you think that? It seems more reasonable to believe that people who talk and hear about race frequently are more likely to view a stranger as a black man rather than as just a man, and are therefore more likely to exhibit implicit bias towards him.

Implicit biases are very real, but they're also an argument for eliminating racial discourse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981701)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:28 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

because the dominant racial discourse is precisely that race doesn't matter, and yet over decades it doesn't seem that racial biases are just going to go away of their own accord.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981726)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:31 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

We haven't had so much as a month that didn't include public discourse involving racial generalizations.

We can't say ignoring race doesn't work, because we've never made any serious effort to do so.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981740)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:36 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

i doubt that racial chatter on the news is heavily influencing people's attitudes in either direction. the prevailing cultural attitude is that race doesn't matter and shouldn't be talked about in people's lives, and this is what people have been operating under for a long time now.

besides, i don't think it's desirable to erase the concept of race from our consciousness altogether. racial thinking provides a source of identity and diversity to the world. in and of itself, it's a good thing. rather, the goal should be to stem the perverse effects of racial thinking, and part of that is to address the undeniable problems we have had in the past that continue to fester in more hidden and subtle forms today.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981758)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:44 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

I'm convinced it has had an impact, but I doubt we're going to find evidence to settle the issue either way. The attitude that race doesn't matter has played an important role in society over the past few decades, and racism has also drastically diminished over that period. Serious problems remain, but we've done something(s) that work.

Racial identity may have a some useful place in an ideal society, but I think racial generalizations are too destructive to ever be promoted without promoting problems from the past.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981788)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:50 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

i don't think anyone is really considering the eradication of race from our consciousness. even MLK when he said people should be judged by the content of their character, really meant that we shouldn't let race cloud our judgments, not that it should disappear from our minds completely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981827)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:10 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

I look at race and AA this way:

All the races are running a 100m sprint. Whites have been running for a long time, they're 3/4 of the way finished. Blacks just started running. Sure, both groups are now running full speed, but one group clearly had a huge and insurmountable head start.

To point to the fact that both groups are running and say, "Look! everyone is participating, everything is fine!" is deeply flawed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981634)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:12 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

That's a silly and demonstrably false way to look at it. Some whites were born ahead, but these days some blacks were too, and some whites are born in poverty. Impoverished whites aren't 3/4 of the way finished with anything, nor are wealthy black families starting at the beginning of the track.

This is exactly the kind of misconception that inhibits racial progress.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981656)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:14 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

cr. The best way to make race less important is to stop focusing on race. Everything else has a very bad record of making things worse.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981666)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:17 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

We can all point to personal anecdotes in our everyday lives, but that does not invalidate general trends among the races.

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/newsroom/img/posts/Screen%20Shot%202013-08-28%20at%203.23.38%20PM.png

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981676)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:18 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

By your logic we should also racially profile blacks as likely criminals.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981681)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:19 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

No. Blacks don't need to be marginalized anymore than they have been in the past.

We, as a society, have an obligation to help blacks reach for greater economic equality and independence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981690)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:21 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Why does society have that obligation? Because blacks are more likely to be poor? Blacks are also more likely to commit crimes. If we're going to take action motivated by racial generalizations, isn't that a reasonable one to act on as well?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981695)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:25 PM
Author: umber halford really tough guy

Society has that obligation because our society disenfranchised blacks. The repercussions of NOT trying to reverse the adverse effects of Jim Crow and slavery would more than likely, be far, far worse than what we see today.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981715)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:30 PM
Author: Diverse Cruise Ship Friendly Grandma

Our society isn't made up of the people who did those things. It seems difficult for any reasonable system of justice to allow a man's crimes to create obligations for his descendants multiple generations out, for immigrants to his location, and for descendants of immigrants to that location.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981734)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:59 PM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

Do you know who FIRST disenfranchised blacks? Polygynous hoe-farming societies in Sub-Saharan Africa where excess black males were sold off as slaves. Why not have the hypergamous women and their polygynous husbands who created and benefited from these societies reverse the effects of selling their unwanted men into slavery for thousands of years?

Western society also disenfranchised Ashkenazi Jews. Let's talk about how the Holocaust resulted in Jews being completely excluded from science and all high-paying professions.

Wait, that never happened. Disenfranchisement as an explanation for different levels of economic development is completely contradicted by actual history.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981863)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:18 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

cr

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981971)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:52 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

Shitlibs decided knew they had nowhere left to go with overt racism, so had to come up with something to explain why black people are doing so poorly. Obviously if we assume that everyone is biologically equal, the problems must stem from bad things white people are doing--hence "privilege". Obviously this is completely wrong since the assumption that people are biologically equal is wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981519)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:54 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you don't have to believe in biological equality to believe in the idea of privilege.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981536)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:57 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

The idea that some people are lucky because, for example, they were born in America rather than Uganda, is fine. The idea that people should feel guilty about this is the problem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981558)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:00 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

not a problem at all, it is the only moral view to have. if you're born lucky in a way that another person suffers simply because they were not born lucky, yes you should feel bad about it. and if you ignored this situation for your entire life because you benefited from it and thereby grew complacent and blind to the unfair misery of others, then yes you should feel guilty about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981577)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:06 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

They're not suffering because you were born in a situation with less suffering. They're suffering because they were born in a situation with suffering. You are completely irrelevant.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981612)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:07 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

lol, what?

are you dumb or something?

we have a system in place whereby some people are lucky and don't suffer, and others are unlucky and do suffer. insomuch as you are a beneficiary of the system, you should feel bad. insomuch as you don't take steps to change the system, you should feel guilty.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981618)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:08 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

I'm responding to your implication that I should feel guilty that I was born here rather than in Uganda. The truth is that I am irrelevant to their suffering.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981625)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:08 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

we have a system in place whereby some people are lucky and don't suffer, and others are unlucky and do suffer. insomuch as you are a beneficiary of the system, you should feel bad. insomuch as you don't take steps to change the system, you should feel guilty.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981629)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:10 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

I'm not even involved in a system that's making Ugandan's suffer. You're completely abrogating their personal responsibility.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981639)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:15 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

you benefit from the systems that caused blacks in america to suffer, and that (more indirectly) caused ugandans to suffer. maybe you don't want to talk about ugandans, that's fine. privilege has mostly been applied to minorities here at home. surely you can't abrogate YOUR responsibility to do something, even if it's small, to change the system that gave you the tremendous privileges with which you were born, while leaving minorities in a greatly inferior position.

it's not either-or. you can get whites to stop being ignorant and complacent, while at the same time exhoriting minorities to step it up.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981669)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:21 PM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

No, most whites in America aren't benefiting in any way from the oppression of blacks. If anything, most whites just try not to interact with blacks on a practical basis, living in mostly white neighborhoods, going to mostly white schools, aspiring to work in mostly-white professions, marrying other whites, raising other whites, and, when not legally forbidden, hiring other whites. The only time whites commonly interact with blacks is when trying to teach them or arresting them (and even anti-racist folks like Tim Wise admit that the % of blacks in prison closely reflects the % who actually commit crimes.)

White society was not built by oppressing minorities (whereby 'oppression' we mean 'ignoring') but by white people actually building a society. Asians and Jews do well in white society despite oppression because they, too, have worked hard to build a society.

I work in my multi-ethnic neighborhood to make a nice neighborhood with a high standard of living for everyone here. I am not responsible for other people in other neighborhoods who do not make their neighborhoods nice. I am not going to go to their neighborhood and water their trees and weed their yards and fix their broken shit.

Please do show me where I have personally benefited from the suffering of Ugandans--or the suffering of anyone.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981990)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:35 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

did america benefit from the labor and resources of non-white people? do you benefit from being an american? i rest my case.

i'm not saying it makes you equivalent to being a slaveholder, but it should make you reflect.

and even if you benefited precisely zero from the subjugation of minorities (which is highly unlikely), to the extent that the system we have is currently unfair to them, then it is your implicit responsibility to try to do something to remedy that. sure you don't have to, but a decent person would try to see if it's true and if there's something they can do to help.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982094)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:38 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

I'm confused. How does a random white american who in some thirdhand way benefits from historical international exploitation benefit any more than a random black american?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982123)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:42 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

the advancement of american interests was historically equivalent to the advancement of white american interests.

because whites were in power and received the benefits of its prosperity more than people of color.

not every single white person benefited materially from this, surely, but every white person did benefit in the sense that the subjugation of minorities within america increased his status in the narrow racial sense that as a white man he can do more things and be looked upon with more dignity than an equivalent man of color.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982154)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:45 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

How, pray tell, does a white immigrant, or the child of white immigrants benefit from your "historical equivalency" any more than people of color?

Your use of past tense is obnoxious. Yes, white people in the past benefitted from American expansionism more than black people. If we had a time machine, this would make a difference for people living in the modern day. Unfortunately, time machines don't exist.

Today, America's dominant status in the world benefits American blacks at least as much as it benefits American whites.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982182)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:48 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

the whole idea of privilege is that every white person benefits from a slew of small subtle things that together accumulate into something big. and these small subtle things, such as teachers being more willing to mentor them in a classroom as a result of implicit racial bias, are in some way descended from more overt institutions of racism like slavery and segregation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982198)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:49 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

The whole idea of privilege, in other words, is bullshit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982202)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:51 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

makes sense to me bro

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982218)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:58 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

The idea that *teachers*, a group of people who have uniformly been educated in post-60's social justice-obsessed liberal arts departments, and who blindly vote democrat in lockstep, favor white students over black students because of America's racist history is fucking laughable.

Then again, so is the rest of this idiocy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982251)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:59 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

dude that's just an example. that you would treat it as the entirety of the argument, is flat out ridiculous.

and the fact is, everyone has strong implicit racial biases. that's a fact bro. you are running up against a well known fact in psychology, which is also common sense to non-reptiles.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982261)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 8:02 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

Your argument literally changes with every post.

I agree regarding implicit racial bias. But that has *NOTHING* to do with the historical argument you were advancing ITT.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982279)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 3rd, 2013 2:46 AM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

Asians and Jews are clearly getting better SAT scores than whites because teachers like them best.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23984826)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 3rd, 2013 2:44 AM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

1. We're talking about black folks, not 'non-whites'.

2. Did "America" benefit from the enslavement of black folks 150 years ago? Probably not. The vast, vast majority of people didn't own slaves, but the average person in slave-holding areas suffered from depressed wages due to slavery. Tellingly, the slave-holding regions of the country were economically less-advanced than the abolitionist states.

3. Did any of the wealth obtained by slaveholders in the 1800s accrue to modern day society? No; the Civil War destroyed the South, and it remains economically less developed than the North to this day.

4. Has "America" benefited from the labor of blacks since the Civil War? Unlikely. Most of the "oppression" of black folks these days consists of white folks simply trying to avoid them. I am not benefited by avoiding someone; at best it's neutral, at worst, I spend effort on avoiding them. Whites must nevertheless pay to educate blacks, give them welfare, and pay to imprison disproportionate #s of black criminals, while large swathes of urban infrastructure are rendered unusable by anyone who doesn't want to get mugged or assaulted. Sounds like a bad bargain to me.

5. Do I benefit from being an American? Probably not; I could have been born in just about any European country and a few Asian ones, none of which historically had Africans minorities to oppress, and enjoy the exact same standard of living as I enjoy here. European and Asian cultures did not get where they are by oppressing black people, but by working hard to make their societies nice places to live.

6. Do black folks benefit, today, from being Americans? IDK. On the one hand, I think people are happier and have more dignity in societies where they're part of the majority. On the other hand, mass famine, genocide, slaver, and cannibalism are still realities in Africa.

It makes me reflect that privilege-mongers are completely full of shit.

If my neighbor plants a beautiful garden, and I sit on my ass and grow weeds, when she has a pile of fresh veggies and I still have weeds, do I complain that she didn't hire me to work in her garden? No, I plant my own damn garden.

How is the current system unfair to black people in the US? Are they being imprisoned disproportionate to their crime rates? Are they required to have higher SAT scores than whites and Asians to get into college? Are they discriminated against in gov't hiring?

Did the Ashkenazim need AA to invent pretty much all of modern science just before the Germans tried to wipe them off the face of the planet? No. Did Germany benefit from the Holocaust? No. By your logic, Jews should be the poorest folks in the world.

I already believe in helping the less fortunate and treating people as individuals, not stereotypes. Not because of your arguments or some warped sense of historical guilt and self-loathing, but because that's how I think all humans should operate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23984821)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 5:57 PM
Author: amber aromatic pit

privileged is something that is invented by people to rationalize their degenerate behaviors

of course inequality exists - but privilege can be applied to fucking anything - no one has to feel sorry for having some sort of advantages as long as they obey the golden rule and are tolerant.

Of course libs are some of the most intolerant, racist and bigoted people I've even encountered so its no surprise that they don't behave in a rational manner.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981557)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:11 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

.......,,....,,...,.......,.,...,.,.,.,., must be WLMAS

Great example of a party line shitlib here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981649)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 6:37 PM
Author: Supple ungodly giraffe

sorry you got pwned in your own thread brah

you're a lightweight little breh

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981761)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:06 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan

I really do appreciate that you're giving a good example of the shitlib party line here. It should be educational to anyone not already familiar with it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981902)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:08 PM
Author: Iridescent dog poop property

he's a lot smarter than WLMAS

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23981914)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:22 PM
Author: Opaque Razzle Institution

fucklaw you so obviously don't know the literature it's impossible to engage with this. do you only read blogs?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982002)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:24 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

"The literature" = modern day shitlib sophistry.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982012)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:25 PM
Author: Opaque Razzle Institution

with which fucklaw is trying to engage.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982019)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:31 PM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

Any argument which requires years of expensive training in ideological "literature" (ie, shitlib college courses and academic discourses,) is a form of elitist oppression because it has been made for the idle rich, by the idle rich. How anyone thinks any actual end to oppression is going to come out of rich people being elitist is beyond me.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982059)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:37 PM
Author: spruce bbw immigrant

CR. The "you didn't read XYZ literature assigned in Gender Studies 401, so surely, you can't speak with intelligence about social issues" argument is the single most obnoxious shitlib argument.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982113)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 8:18 PM
Author: Vibrant newt cumskin

ah yes the classic marxist struggle

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982397)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:56 PM
Author: Vibrant newt cumskin

how are you defining privilege here

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982242)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 2nd, 2013 7:57 PM
Author: Crusty dragon

white

straight

middle class and above

male

Everything else is a sign of oppression

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23982249)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 3rd, 2013 3:02 AM
Author: bonkers walnut old irish cottage goyim

You forgot cis and neurotypical.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23984866)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 3rd, 2013 7:01 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23987629)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 4th, 2013 1:50 PM
Author: Coral patrolman coldplay fan



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=2352644&forum_id=2#23991715)