so trump was just waiting in his boxers to raw dog stormy when she arrived?
| passionate pink corn cake telephone | 05/08/24 | | Brindle odious stock car psychic | 05/08/24 | | passionate pink corn cake telephone | 05/08/24 | | Brindle odious stock car psychic | 05/08/24 | | Razzle-dazzle whorehouse place of business | 05/08/24 | | passionate pink corn cake telephone | 05/08/24 | | Brindle odious stock car psychic | 05/08/24 | | passionate pink corn cake telephone | 05/08/24 | | Brindle odious stock car psychic | 05/09/24 | | insane tattoo | 05/08/24 | | Lascivious sienna stag film | 05/08/24 | | crusty sable wrinkle faggot firefighter | 05/08/24 | | Brindle odious stock car psychic | 05/08/24 | | adulterous yellow fat ankles ticket booth | 05/09/24 | | passionate pink corn cake telephone | 05/09/24 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 8th, 2024 5:37 AM Author: passionate pink corn cake telephone
It was the courtroom face-off everyone was waiting for -- testimony of high legal importance, and salacious sexual content.
Donald Trump, the former US president who has always prided himself on being in charge and in control, was forced to sit and listen to a porn star describe in open court a bedroom encounter that he denies ever took place.
"When I opened the bathroom door to come out, Mr. Trump had come into the bedroom," Stormy Daniels told the New York court.
"The intention was pretty clear, someone stripped down to their underwear posing on the bed waiting for you."
Trump stared ahead through Daniels' testimony, which often veered into graphic sexual detail despite the judge's best efforts.
"My clothes and shoes were off, I think I still had my bra on. We were in missionary position."
Was he wearing a condom? "No."
Was it brief? "Yes."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5526359&forum_id=2#47644337) |
Date: May 8th, 2024 11:11 AM Author: Lascivious sienna stag film
i dont see how you could give stormy any credibility as a witness. she has a pecuniary interest in making things sound as salacious as possible, and an emotional interest in ruining trump. her story has not stayed consistent over the years either.
of course none of this testimony should have been allowed in the first place, it's obviously very prejudicial and irrelevant to the alleged crime
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=5526359&forum_id=2#47644734) |
|
|