The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
rough calculation - xoxo just cost USNWR at least $300K
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 28th, 2006 6:55 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo i can only assume these scores are making the law school circuit as we speak. everyone from future students to current students to deans won't be in any rush to snatch one off the store shelves (well i guess the deans will, for the more detailed explanations).
well done... we're closer yet to the subpoena! |
 |
Date: March 28th, 2006 6:56 PM Author: arrogant aphrodisiac electric furnace marketing idea lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450288) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:03 PM Author: mind-boggling brunch gaping It's not funny, GTO better take the real ranking down. It's analogous to the napster lawsuits. Although it's probably not worth it for US News to come after this board, for the publicity alone (we're not talking about Napster level damages here.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450336) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:09 PM Author: red supple bawdyhouse it's been a while since i had copyright, but they can't sue him for letting a third party post a link to infringed material. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450370) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:12 PM Author: mind-boggling brunch gaping it wouldn't be open and shut, no case is, but they could win. there are two sides to every lawsuit and I think they could win if they had evidence that it hurt their sales. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450388) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:02 PM Author: red supple bawdyhouse if they go after anyone it should be the guys hosting the PDFs, and the bookstores that put the rankings out early. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450582) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 6:57 PM Author: aromatic tattoo haha, excellent observation (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450289) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 6:57 PM Author: Swollen corn cake house 2 Subpoenas!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450293) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 6:59 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo i have to assume that when the lawyers at USNWR go looking for leaked scores this is among the first places they come looking? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450307) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2007 1:41 PM Author: Ruby mediation garrison 2 mo
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=331077 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=617425&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591664&mc=9&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=54&forum_id=2 http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&forum_id=2&PHPSESSID=d3275a68320df53fb45fe1e232cb3b53 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=55&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617176&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=1&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=15&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617793&mc=34&forum_id=2 |
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:06 PM Author: vivacious awkward den I would think posting the rankings alone is fair use (or at least there is an argument for it) but the articles, thats a problem. I mean the rankings are derived from open source stuff to begin with, but the articles sure arent. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450357) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:08 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo the source may be open, but the formula isn't.
that's like saying that "well, i thought i could just take those diamond earrings from the jewelry store, because they are made out of carbon, and we all know that carbon is everywhere." |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:10 PM Author: crawly codepig immigrant haha i like this analogy (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450376) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:21 PM Author: navy hell water buffalo undercover gunner == jack valenti? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450421) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:12 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy The RIAA/MPAA might want you to confuse concepts of property theft with intellectual property infringements, but that doesn't mean it's correct. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450390) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:21 PM Author: mind-boggling brunch gaping he means, for example, that there is a lot of work involved in surveying schools and judges/lawyers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450417) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:30 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy The amount of effort has nothing to do with it. I could scribble something on a piece of paper and it'd be copyrightable as my expression.
But see below. Ideas and formulas are in the province of patents, not copyrights. And nobody is claiming that xoxo is distributing US News' actual formula anyway. |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:54 PM Author: mind-boggling brunch gaping Subject: Read the Grokster case you TTTD Why are there so many TTT idiots on this board? Is this board supposed to be prestigious?
Listen you idiot, if I spend a shit load of time researching and surveying for information, then a shit load of time organizing and publishing it, FOR $$$$, then you can't just copy my product and distribute it for free. Nor can you create a forum for others to copy and distribute my stuff.
|
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:03 PM Author: Chrome Sinister Locus well, it depends on the nature of the information. databases of simple facts (e.g. telephone books) aren't directly copyrightable in the US (they are in europe). here it might be more complicated b/c the reputational scores are based on (probably) proprietary surveys.
in any case, you're both making points that are at least somewhat valid: his: 1) US news has a stronger case where the entire page is scanned and linked 2) they likely won't have any case where the simple rankings are posted
yours: 1) they might have a case where the details of the rankings are posted w/o a scan 2) even if they don't have a very good case, they probably have a colorable argument and could cost this website a bundle if they sued |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:06 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy I can't copy your writing. I can write and talk about your *ideas* all I want. In this case, we can't copy the articles, and we can't copy the published tables. But the proposition that US News thinks Yale is better than Stanford is better than Harvard -- this is an idea and it is *not* copyrighted. This is the distinction that valen was trying to make, and which you apparently still haven't grasped. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450613) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:12 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund If you are talking about copyright protection then how much time and money you spend is irrelevant. Copying the actual pages of the USNEWS is obvious infringement. There is plenty of text all over the pages that are expression. Copying the tables wouldn't be since it would be mere fact, and the merger doctrine would also apply. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450638) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:20 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy You can't copy the tables directly, since the design, layout, etc. are all expression. If I scribbled "2 + 2 = 4" on a piece of paper, you can't make a copy of my scribble. But you could scribble "2 + 2 = 4" yourself, as your own expression, as many times as you wanted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450685) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:26 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund this is correct. the font types and borders etc are protectable. I was merely pointing out that you can make a table depicting the rankings. I worded it very poorly. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450701) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:28 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy How does this fit with what you were pointing out below? While I was writing my post above, I was wondering if you could just type the US News table into Word and distribute that. Would it make a difference if I left out the reputation scores and total scores, but still kept the ranking numbers? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450712) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:32 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund yeah, that's a problem. The case i mentioned below is thought to have been a ruling on the outer boundaries of the idea/expression dichotomy. If the evaluations are expressions then you can't recreate them in a table as if they were mere facts. So, if the case below holds, you are screwed, no?
Even if you took a few numbers out, it would still likely be found to be substantially similar. |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:10 PM Author: red supple bawdyhouse there's also a difference between a third party posting a link to infringing material and hosting infringing material on your server. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450375) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:13 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund if the host is aware that infringing material has been posted, the host does have a duty to take reasonable steps in removing it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450649) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:10 PM Author: mind-boggling brunch gaping Which is why you're TTT. Something so highly anticipated can not possibly be posted under fair use.
Expect to fail miserably at law. |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:19 PM Author: vivacious awkward den while I admit to not taking IP law and not knowing what Im talking about here, which is made abundantly clear by the tone of my original post, "highly anticipated" has got to be a joke. USNEWS is the #3!!! news magazine, the schools get phoned and told their rank so the administrations are not sitting there anticipating shit and most people, including most law school applicants and students are not anal XOXO posters. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450414) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:53 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo gee, it's amazing they even bother to publish it in print at all, given there's apparently no market for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450532) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:15 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy I think this is right. You can't copyright ideas, just expressions of those ideas.
Yale above Stanford above Harvard, etc -- this is just an idea, it doesn't matter who came up with it (unless you can patent it). Only its published form is copyrightable (i.e. the scans and copies of the actual pages). |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:20 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund this is partly incorrect. the usnews rankings may not just be an idea. see the redbook case. the court found that the Red Book valuations (car values) were opinions that included at least the minimum standard of originality required by Feist. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450683) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:26 PM Author: crystalline ladyboy Thanks, I knew there was a case about stuff like ranking/ordering but I forgot what it was. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450700) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:28 PM Author: cobalt piazza trust fund no problem. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450713) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:45 PM Author: Galvanic honey-headed sneaky criminal you guys scared the UNC dude into droppin the link. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450519) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:45 PM Author: Galvanic honey-headed sneaky criminal (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450520) |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 7:54 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo it's too late. i've already received copies of the pdf (same one) from three different listserves.
it's out. all sourced back to here! |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:14 PM Author: Erotic well-lubricated market puppy True. I emailed the fucker all over DC. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=389024&forum_id=2#5450654) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2007 1:39 PM Author: Ruby mediation garrison http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=331077 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=617425&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591664&mc=9&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=54&forum_id=2 http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&forum_id=2&PHPSESSID=d3275a68320df53fb45fe1e232cb3b53 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=55&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617176&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=1&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=15&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=12&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617793&mc=34&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:19 PM Author: sepia doobsian institution blood rage How many 0L people knew the 2006 law rankings this time last year but bought a online edition anyway? As a matter of convenience, prospective students, deans, adcomms, etc. buy it anyway because nobody is going to remember all the internal numbers a week from now.
Plus, I think majority of their business comes from non-Law graduate school prospects. |
|
Date: March 28th, 2006 8:39 PM Author: painfully honest sapphire ceo if there wasn't a market for it, they wouldn't do it.
and no, as a prospective student i never went out and bought it. i came here. |