Michael Fertik: Practicing Law Without a License?
| Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | At-the-ready Rambunctious Queen Of The Night | 04/15/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | soggy sable tanning salon | 04/14/07 | | galvanic sneaky criminal | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | galvanic sneaky criminal | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | galvanic sneaky criminal | 04/05/07 | | flesh boltzmann | 04/05/07 | | galvanic sneaky criminal | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | galvanic sneaky criminal | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | hideous avocado garrison | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | flesh boltzmann | 04/05/07 | | khaki pea-brained office | 04/05/07 | | startling vermilion casino | 04/24/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | Lake appetizing dingle berry | 04/05/07 | | Wine bull headed candlestick maker | 04/05/07 | | hideous avocado garrison | 04/05/07 | | Flushed field | 04/24/07 | | Bateful Crawly Fortuitous Meteor | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | Adventurous Meetinghouse | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | Adventurous Meetinghouse | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | nudist cheese-eating athletic conference | 04/05/07 | | nudist cheese-eating athletic conference | 04/05/07 | | Maize jew | 04/05/07 | | soggy sable tanning salon | 04/24/07 | | motley rehab kitty cat | 04/05/07 | | nudist cheese-eating athletic conference | 04/05/07 | | motley rehab kitty cat | 04/05/07 | | nudist cheese-eating athletic conference | 04/05/07 | | soggy sable tanning salon | 04/14/07 | | hideous avocado garrison | 04/05/07 | | Passionate piazza chad | 04/14/07 | | amber lascivious halford stead | 07/02/07 | | curious orange community account gas station | 02/06/08 | | Arousing navy juggernaut church building | 02/06/08 | | Arousing navy juggernaut church building | 02/06/08 | | curious orange community account gas station | 02/06/08 | | chartreuse sanctuary | 04/07/08 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:13 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
Date: April 5th, 2007 7:14 PM
Author: MoreDoughHi
ask him why he isn't a member of any state bar yet threatens possible legal action on behalf of a 3rd party (his client) which is against the law.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608340&forum_id=2#7880463 )
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881208)
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:13 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
Maybe we need to file a complaint.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881210) |
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:14 PM Author: galvanic sneaky criminal
I really wonder where the line is drawn.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881214) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:44 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
In general, "the practice of law is not limited to conducting litigation. It also includes giving legal advice and counsel, rendering a service that requires the use of legal knowledge or skill, and preparing instruments and contracts by which legal rights are secured, whether or not the matter is pending in a court." AMJUR ATTNYS § 118.
In Kentucky: SCR 3.020 Practice of law defined / The practice of law is any service rendered involving legal knowledge or legal advice, whether of representation, counsel or advocacy in or out of court, rendered in respect to the rights, duties, obligations, liabilities, or business relations of one requiring the services. But nothing herein shall prevent any natural person not holding himself out as a practicing attorney from drawing any instrument to which he is a party without consideration unto himself therefor. An appearance in the small claims division of the district court by a person who is an officer of or who is regularly employed in a managerial capacity by a corporation or partnership which is a party to the litigation in which the appearance is made shall not be considered as unauthorized practice of law.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881420) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:16 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
ReputationDefender, Inc. 2023 Cherokee Parkway Suite #18 Louisville, KY 40204
January 10, 2007
Dear Mr. Popken,
We are writing to you in behalf of Ronnie Segev. He has asked us to contact you and see if you will consider removing the content about him at:
http://www.consumerist.com/consumer/evil/priceline-has-customer-arrested-for-diligent-refund-attempt-150618.php
Please allow us to introduce ourselves. We are ReputationDefender, Inc., a company dedicated to helping our clients preserve their good name on the Internet. Our founders and employees are all regular Internet users. Like our clients, and perhaps like you, we think the Internet is sometimes unnecessarily hurtful to the privacy and reputations of everyday people. Even content that is meant to be informative can sometimes have a significant and negative impact on someone's job prospects, student applications, and personal life. We invite you to learn more about who we are, at www.reputationdefender.com.
When our clients sign up with our service, we undertake deep research about them on the Internet to see what the Web is saying about them. We find sites where they are discussed, and we ask our clients how they feel about those sites. Sometimes our clients express strong reservations about the content on particular websites. They may feel hurt, ashamed, or "invaded" by the content about them on those sites.
As you may know, more and more prospective employers, universities, and newfound friends and romantic interests undertake Internet research, and the material they find can strongly impact their impressions of the people they are getting to know. When people apply for jobs, apply for college or graduate school, apply for loans, begin dating, or seek to do any number of other things with their lives, hurtful content about them on the Internet can have a negative impact on their opportunities. At some point or another, most of us say things about ourselves or our friends and acquaintances we later regret. We're all human, and we all do it!
We are writing to you today because our client, Ronnie Segev, has told us that he would like the content about him on your website to be removed as it is outdated and disturbing to him. Would you be willing to remove or alter the content? It would mean so much to Mr. Segev, and to us. Considerate actions such as these will go a long way to help make the Internet a more civil place.
Thank you very much for your consideration. We are mindful that matters like these can be sensitive. We appreciate your time.
Please let us know if you have removed or changed the content on this site by sending an e-mail to: daves@reputationdefender.com.
Yours sincerely,
Dave S.
Reputation Defender Service Team
http://consumerist.com/consumer/evil/ronnie-segev--reputationdefender-can-eat-a-dick-227969.php
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881593) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:22 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
But what happens *after* the letter? They claim to have a "destroy" process.
What are the possibilities for "destroying" information about a person?
(1) Persuasion. Get the site to remove it. That's the form letter.
(2) Hack. Break in and remove it yourself. That's illegal.
(3) Demand letter. That's practicing law.
(4) Bribe. Pay the site to remove it. That's expensive.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881623)
|
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:29 PM Author: galvanic sneaky criminal
I got a cease and desist letter on Heide and Brittan's behalf from some San Francisco 3rd year associate.
Fertik has also claimed in interviews that he is seeking legal counsel for the girls and picking up the costs.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881670) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:32 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
Sounds like Reputation Defender sends out cheesey form letters and then acts as a legal referral service.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881686) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:33 PM Author: Maize jew
what u wanna bet the Keker & Van Ness charges aren't included in the $30 "search & destroy" fee?
LOL
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881693) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 11:26 PM Author: hideous avocado garrison
You'd think so. But he hasn't been. He's sending cease-and-desist letters, threatening legal action on behalf of third parties, talking about his law degree and noting it prominently on his promotional website.
His website even says that most of the things they to do destroy content are non-legal; implying that some legal services are provided.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7882050) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:27 PM Author: Maize jew
they sent me a letter like that.
weird that they didnt send you guys one.
mine was related to the t14 contest.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881663) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:03 PM Author: flesh boltzmann
"What are you suggesting he'd done?"
is this correct grammatically?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881524) |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:10 PM Author: Wine bull headed candlestick maker
"we focus on content that is slanderous, private, defamatory, invasive, and/or outdated." http://www.reputationdefender.com/FAQ.php#12
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881559) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:26 PM Author: Lake appetizing dingle berry
Does ReputationDefender simply send cease-and-desist letters or sue everybody when it seeks to "Destroy" content?
No. Most of our approaches to effecting correction or removal of content are non-legal. We will only pursue legal options with the express consent of our clients, and these techniques are strictly optional and usually the last resort. They may incur additional cost.
---
Seems to imply that RD provides both legal and non-legal services.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881652) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 11:22 PM Author: hideous avocado garrison
this is ridiculous. this is not even near the line. I dont know about you guys, but my state bar association fucking shits a brick if you even put JD on your business card if you aren't admitted.
he has gone WAY over the line here. We need to file a complaint.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7882019) |
 |
Date: April 24th, 2007 1:06 PM Author: Flushed field
"Clearly cease-and-desist letters are legal."
I don't think that's true. Just asking someone to stop doing something isn't necessarily providing legal services if, as apparently they do, you refrain from stating legal opinions in the letters.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7992746) |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:14 PM Author: Bateful Crawly Fortuitous Meteor
There was a sample letter kicking around at one point...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881583) |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:36 PM Author: nudist cheese-eating athletic conference
if you check the christian science monitor archives, there is a pic of him in a story. hairstyle is so 15 years ago.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881712) |
 |
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:46 PM Author: Maize jew
here is how reputation defender "scours" the web.... are you ready???
www.google.com --> type in your name ---> print out results
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7881765)
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 11:19 PM Author: hideous avocado garrison
He has repeatedly threatened legal action on behalf of a third party. And he has persistently implied that he is a lawyer. The prominence he gives his Harvard Law degree in interviews and his promise to 'destroy' content on the internet would lead an ordinary person to assume that he was legal counsel for his clients.
When this story first broke a bunch of posters were even confused as to whether or not he was a lawyer, because he was threatening law suits and talking about his harvard law degree in interviews.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#7882000) |
Date: February 6th, 2008 12:12 AM Author: curious orange community account gas station
this is #7 when you google "michael fertik". not very impressive at all. Maybe Reputation Defender has won? I will keep watching, but am starting to think that Fertik might be good at this!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#9278576) |
Date: February 6th, 2008 12:20 AM Author: Arousing navy juggernaut church building
Michael Fertik: Practicing law without a buttoned shirt?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#9278618) |
Date: April 7th, 2008 3:25 PM Author: chartreuse sanctuary
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&forum_id=2#9591432) |
|
|