The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
i am SICK of this whore... and she just go into BOALT (160)
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:46 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,26967.msg394334.html#msg394334
please, everyone rain on her fucking 160 parade |
 |
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:50 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness Those who troll for glass houses should not cast stones. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244335) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:52 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital BASH her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244358) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:53 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness On the other hand, you raise a good point sir. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244366) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:58 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital fucking right. BASH BASH BASH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244430) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:57 PM Author: cracking hominid faggotry 180. Best post of the night.
Say what you will about Boalt, it's certainly no UT. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:23 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Or UCLA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245578) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:28 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital 172 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245630) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 8:20 PM Author: Racy sepia idiot theater stage 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2252271) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:52 PM Author: Wonderful Coffee Pot she and ruskie can hang out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244354) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:57 PM Author: Flirting halford milk In the middle of the class. They are not the worst at this TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244406) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:57 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma I'm actually glad that Berkeley exists, because I feel that there should be at least one school that values GPA over LSAT. Some people just suck hardcore at standardized tests but are otherwise capable of amazing things; other people misbubble or just plain fuck up and score 10 points below their prep-tests. If you are one of these people, at least you know that you have a shot at Boalt, which is the only remaining prestigious school that still actually looks at ECs etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244412) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:58 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness Yale looks at EC's. They should go to Yale instead. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244420) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:59 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Nah, Yale is for people who can both rock the LSAT and who have Berkeley creds. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244440) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:58 PM Author: snowy striped hyena People who misbubble or fuck up should take the test again. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244421) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:59 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma I agree, but ten points is a helluva lot to gain by averaging. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244431) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:00 PM Author: snowy striped hyena It is. However, it's more credible than "I misbubbled." And some schools take the higher score.
Bad luck is bad luck. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:02 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Some schools claim that they take the higher score; however, I really doubt that they do, given my own experience.
But yes, bad luck is bad luck is bad luck, no getting around it. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 11:27 PM Author: gaped macaca regret I had a 2.7 158/169. I was waitlisted at NU and accepted after W/L at GULC, meanwhile I was rejecteed by American and Oregon. I strongly believe that these two schools looked at my higher LSAT more than my low LSAT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246015) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:01 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness They should just have their brilliant rec writers recommend the LSAT give them a 183. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244458) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:04 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma I will concede that nothing annoys me more than applicants who brag about "glowing recs," this is a pretty toolish thing to do. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244483) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:59 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital ... shouldnt be taking the test to begin with
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:01 PM Author: Flirting halford milk Correct. As someone who messed up (167) I didn't whine about it, I just took it again (179). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244462) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:02 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Yep, in fact I have the exact same LSAT numbers as you do (167/179). Did you take the Oct '04 / Dec '04 LSATs by any chance? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244472) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:04 PM Author: Flirting halford milk Yes. How have you faired with these scores? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244494) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:06 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Damn, what was UP with the October test? I never hit below 175 in my recent practices...I got to the October test and made all sorts of stupid mistakes. The December test seemed like a fucking cakewalk in comparison...
EDIT: My results are middling since my GPA sucks (3.3 from HYP Engineering / English). I've been pretty much WL'd everywhere, still waiting for my top choice (UMich) to come back. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:10 PM Author: Flirting halford milk With a 3.6 (Engineering/Math from unknown Christian college) I was admitted at Michigan and Duke, WL'd at Penn and am waiting on Harvard and Yale. Good luck with michigan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244546) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:12 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Thanks, good luck to you too, although I don't think you'll need it. I'm sure that even your averaged LSAT will give you a lock at CCN (let alone dropping the 179 bomb), and I'd be fairly surprised if you didn't get at least one of the H/Y/S. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244569) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:16 PM Author: Flirting halford milk Thanks. I wasn't interested in CCNS so all thats left are HY. I really am just hoping for money from Michigan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244630) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:58 PM Author: ivory national chad The october test blew...just my two cents (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2250870) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:03 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness correct. or cancel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244476) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:20 PM Author: embarrassed to the bone charismatic school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244662) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:08 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "I have a lot of respect for Berkeley's refusal to bow down to the idol of USN&WR and place a huge emphasis on the LSAT."
Yes, because majoring in a cake subject and volunteering are clear predictors of success in the legal profession. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:26 PM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank You're just JEALOUS that you can't get into Boalt. Face it buddy, it's one of the top 10 -- better than Duke, Northwestern on that matter -- the whole University is ranked #2 in the WORLD by the London Higher Education Supplement....
don't turn jealousy and insecurity into anger.
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:26 PM Author: Comical sable feces hell yall just bitter because you got dinged (or will be) at boalt with higher numbers. don't hate someone who's accomplished something in her life besides getting the top score and is rewarded for it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244713) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:30 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital why would i apply to dolt? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244988) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:35 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245050) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:18 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245531) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 4:02 PM Author: vivacious library Boalt is a true TTT! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2257745) |
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:53 PM Author: Glittery Whorehouse Is she a URM? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244369) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:56 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital no, she's white. she has "GLOWING" recs!! as evidenced by her acceptance to the political science program at LSE. c'mon, everything that is not eco at LSE fucking blows (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244400) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 8:58 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital its funny b/c she's bitched about AA on a bunch of threads using the argument that "they have lower scores and are unqualified. this means they wont perform as well. schools are doing these unqualified applicants a disservice by accepting them." i wonder if she's going to tell BOALT to go fuck themselves b/c she would never go to a t14 school willing to admit such an unqualified, ignorant whore like her (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244424) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2005 11:35 PM Author: startling bateful pit voyeur Um, idiot, as a whole, AA applicants ARE unqualified. They get accepted with way lower LSATS and way lower GPAs. If all AA applicants had 160 LSAT and GPA better than 99% of admittees, there would actually be a reason to argue that AA admits are as a whole equally qualified. As it stands, they have both lower GPAs and LSATS. (Not that I know her GPA, but I'm assuming.) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2266180) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:07 PM Author: mustard theater There is no AA at CA public schools (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244514) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:25 PM Author: buck-toothed senate useless brakes No, AA is not legal at CA public schools. It still exists though. It's easier for Boalt to find minorities with high GPA's than high LSAT's. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244704) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:31 PM Author: mustard theater Really, how does it still exist? Just because weighting GPA more heavily than LSATs is less likely to screen out as many minorities, based on numbers alone? That is not in any way AA, just a desperate grab at keeping even some minorities in the school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245007) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:57 PM Author: Frum Windowlicker "That is not in any way AA, just a desperate grab at keeping even some minorities in the school."
-isn't AA just a desperate grab at keeping even some minorities in the schools?
maybe i've been wrong all these years |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:04 PM Author: swashbuckling puce stead hairy legs Rest assured that she has a huge ass, a hairy cunt, and her clit is the size of the average asian's penis. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244488) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:05 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital 179 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244502) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:45 PM Author: insanely creepy forum 1. Obscene sexist rants are extremely TTT.
2. Giving a "179" to an obscene sexist rant is TTT.
HTH. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:05 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital Subject: NO ONE IS BASHING HER ON THE LSD THREAD (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244496) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:05 PM Author: Wonderful Coffee Pot I thought you were going to do it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244499) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:06 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness damn groupthink (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244508) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:07 PM Author: Wonderful Coffee Pot just post this thread. she'll love it i'm sure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244515) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:15 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital DUDE, look for the thread with your name on it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244610) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:18 PM Author: Wonderful Coffee Pot which site? LSD? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244649) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:21 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital here. but i was just wondering if you were the same cheeks... which i guess was answered (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244673) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:07 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital no. i act like a nice guy going to Cardozo on LSD for kicks. i have to keep up the niceness (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244519) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:07 PM Author: Odious free-loading twinkling uncleanness That would require we register for LSD though.
The shame... |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:22 PM Author: red athletic conference I bashed her for you. XOXO pride, bitches. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244675) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:25 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital XOXO pride = the new white power? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2244698) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:31 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma You had the best post on LSD. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245655) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:36 PM Author: Alcoholic Amber Kitty Stage If Boalt wants to let unqualified applicants in, who gives a rat's ass? That's their decision. Yes, they are dumb, but again, unless you go there, why the hell does it matter? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245065) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:45 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse saying that someone who gets in is "unqualified" is a negation, isn't it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245187) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:47 PM Author: Alcoholic Amber Kitty Stage Unqualified people get into law schools all of the time. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245203) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:48 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse unless it was a mistake, they must have been qualified, albiet under possibly dubious criteria. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245213) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:26 PM Author: Razzmatazz french chef in light of your case, i think we have our answer (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245609) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:46 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse rain all you want... I'll be crying all the way to Boalt Hall!
And btw, it was probably my hairy ass that got me in. I sent them a huge glossy 8 x 11
jennaye
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 9:51 PM Author: Amethyst razzle field congrats
rather u get in than URMs with AA |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:06 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask You're really not the one who should be bashed. Its really the adcomms who are TTTs.
So congrats. |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:18 PM Author: Razzmatazz french chef yes, you should be proud that you beat the odds/slipped through the cracks/gave the ad comms good head, whichever it was (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245526) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:30 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital why the fuck is whd your name? this is not that whore jennaye (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245642) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:32 PM Author: mind-boggling brass son of senegal goyim Enjoy the bottom third of the class.
Hopefully, you will get some glowing recs from whatever profs you blow and you can squeak into a job with the South Central LA public defender after performing cunnilingus on the hooker daughter of the boss.
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:55 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital "South Central LA public defender"
180 |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:17 AM Author: Massive Hairless Home Don't fuck with my 'hood, dawg. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247516) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 11:03 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king
|
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:05 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask We should really be congratulating UTexas, or possibly UCLA. After all, one of them will soon be entering the T14! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245388) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:07 PM Author: Razzmatazz french chef this is the credited response (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245409) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:34 PM Author: Thirsty stimulating patrolman corner 180. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249316) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:31 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital "I had a stellar application, aside from my LSAT." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2245653) |
|
Date: March 2nd, 2005 10:40 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
And in other news, I'm great at basketball except for the scoring part. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:51 AM Author: diverse glassy knife ape The fact that she posted this shows her stupidity.
If she had one bit of common sense she would not share her dubious accomplishment with the law school message board world. Seeing as how her predecessors both took incessant bashings for their TTTness she shold have been smart and not said anything.
I suppose her stupid cunt attention-whoring personality came out and she felt the need to share and make herself feel special.
Of course, I guess she is special in some way. I mean a 160 is like 5 points over the median at Dolt. Good work. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:52 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246677) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:55 AM Author: Beady-eyed set I would rather have smart slackers as classmates than hard workers of average intelligence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246695) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:55 AM Author: red athletic conference Some motherfucker there called us pathetic. Let's have another raid. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246706) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:08 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246829) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:06 AM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank ALL of you guys are jealous. Four years of a good GPA is true hard work... what can YOU say? There is no way that you guys could get IN to a great law school like Boalt; if so, I fear the maturity that you bring to the law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246818) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:07 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246824) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:09 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "ALL of you guys are jealous."
Why? I go to a higher ranked school and have a large scholarship.
"Four years of a good GPA is true hard work... what can YOU say?"
That GPA is purely subjective. If I hadn't taken any hard science subjects I would have had a near 4.0.
"There is no way that you guys could get IN to a great law school like Boalt"
Many people here go to T14s.
"I fear the maturity that you bring to the law."
Oh man, do you go to law school?
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:10 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246849) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:28 AM Author: crusty native Aren't you the guy at the bottom 25% of your law school? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246988) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:30 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask What's to say she won't be bottom of her class?
And I'll tell you, things at the bottom of my school look far better than the bottom at hers. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:36 AM Author: crusty native I'm just saying, that's a lot of shit talking from someone who should probably keep quiet. You're yapping like one of those loud little dogs that don't know any better.
The bottom 25% of Boalt looks fine. Do you go to Yale? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:39 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "I'm just saying, that's a lot of shit talking from someone who should probably keep quiet."
Why? Its not like we don't all get paid the same upon graduation. Plus, this was after only one semester grades...
"The bottom 25% of Boalt looks fine."
What was it, like at $70-75K last time I checked? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:46 AM Author: crusty native "Why? Its not like we don't all get paid the same upon graduation."
Well ... you know, some of us will be reviewing documents of greater prestige.
"What was it, like at $70-75K last time I checked?"
Not sure where you got those numbers, but even if true, that doesn't necessarily correlate to the bottom of the class grades-wise -- and you don't have enough information to draw that conclusion. Trust me that I'd know this better than you: the people at the bottom 25% of Boalt get offers at firms that I would personally never want to work at, but they will get paid the same as you. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:48 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "Well ... you know, some of us will be reviewing documents of greater prestige."
Ouch.
"Not sure where you got those numbers,"
USNWR
"even if true, that doesn't necessarily correlate to the bottom of the class grades-wise"
Private practice salary, not including PI or government. 25%+ will not willingly choose a $70K firm over a $125K one.
" Trust me that I'd know this better than you: the people at the bottom 25% of Boalt get offers at firms that I would personally never want to work at, but they will get paid the same as you"
I trust official stats more than what your friends tell you. "yeah, I Watchell called me back but I turned THEM down!" Suuuure. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:50 AM Author: crusty native "Ouch."
Glad you follow.
Are you a 1L? Please provide the board with OCI updates next year! |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:51 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Will do actually. If I'm still posting. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247126) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:00 AM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank "The GPA is purely subjective. If I hadn't taken any hard science subjects I would have had a near 4.0"
Aww poor baby, I got a 4.0 in Engineering from MIT. Hard science isn't really hard... its just memorization.
"I go to a higher ranked school and have a large scholarship." PENN is a higher ranked law school? What does Penn produce? How many clerkships? Professors? Notable law journals? Its only riding on an IVY name and high LSAT scores.
I DO go to law school, but not Boalt because I could not go far away from home. You probably got into Penn with a high LSAT and was bummed that you needed more than 4 years of hard work -- and couldn't make up for your shit GPA even though sciences are easy -- to get in. Sorry man. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:17 PM Author: Twinkling Karate Doctorate "I got a 4.0 in Engineering from MIT".
uh huh. sure you did.
1) MIT is on a 5.0 scale 2) "Engineering" is not a major at MIT 3) If you are from MIT, what course were you? 4) engineering is NOT "hard science", and no engineer would equate the two
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 PM Author: Salmon crawly hissy fit yeah, this guy's not even close to being a decent liar. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249663) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 5:11 AM Author: Tan aromatic police squad This is not to imply that i don't know people with 5.0's in engineering here, but they are few and far between, and, obviously, none of them are going to law school.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:50 PM Author: insanely creepy forum ""That GPA is purely subjective. If I hadn't taken any hard science subjects I would have had a near 4.0."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHA! |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:16 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen I have a higher GPA than her (from a better school), a higher LSAT, and I go to a better law school. Hell the overwhelming majority of the current law students who post here go to better law schools than Boalt. This isn't like LSD, where one or two guys go to Harvard and 60% of the board is headed to a tier four. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246881) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:28 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Since when did Fordham become a better school than Boalt? Oh, and I saw you run like a scared little bitch from LSD when someone threatened to report your racist comments to the dean of students. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2246984) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:32 AM Author: multi-colored aquamarine office partner He goes to Penn. I doubt he's saying that people with lower than median LSATs don't deserve to get in. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247015) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:33 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Sure he does. Apparently some random LSD'er knows more about the "great teacher" than you do. Sad.
EDIT: my bad, Onizuka. Someone who used to post on LSD said they were you. Your identity has been verified. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:33 AM Author: multi-colored aquamarine office partner Eh he goes to Penn, his real identity is well known, he doesn't hide it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247031) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:39 AM Author: red athletic conference Haha, she PWN3D herself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247055) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:03 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247188) |
|
Date: March 7th, 2005 3:33 AM Author: jet gaping wagecucks a classic in the modern idiom (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2274285) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 6:29 PM Author: primrose vibrant state HOT. I'd like to see that in person (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2258843) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:36 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247039) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:50 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo u idiot (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247121) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:32 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask WTF? Someone threatened to report what someone said on an anonymous message board to a school official?
A) He could easily deny it was him.
B) It is a completely douche thing to do. I don't care what someone does, reporting them to their school is not cool. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:39 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen I don't go to Fordham, I go to Penn, and I haven't posted a single thing on LSD in my life. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247060) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:02 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247183) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:31 AM Author: crusty native When I was applying to law school Penn was ranked #10 and prestige whores I knew were almost ashamed to attend. I guess the joke's on the rest of us now! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247010) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:40 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "When I was applying to law school Penn was ranked #10 and prestige whores I knew were almost ashamed to attend."
I take it you attend Dolt? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:49 AM Author: crusty native "I take it you attend Dolt?"
I'd be ashamed to admit such a thing, for even if I were in the top 10% of the class at "Dolt" (clever), it would pale in comparison with the rarefied top 75% at another school. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:51 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Good. Glad we understand one another. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247124) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:54 AM Author: crusty native We're both so fucking smart!
I love your "blind man putting down the one-eyed" shtick. Keep up the good work. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:04 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247197) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:38 AM Author: insanely creepy forum Actually, it's "about as prestigious" as being number 1 at your precious Harvard. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255798) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:01 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247173) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:57 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma No, not from a humanities major. From engineering or even econ or anything related to math or the hard quantitative, this premise might be acceptable, but it would be dependant on the school. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247440) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:09 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse AHAHAH.. the fac that you TTT douchebags are all so freaked out about this shows your insecurities.
I will end up in the top 5% of my class, just as I did in undergraduate (despite a mediocre SAT score).
xoxo, hth |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:18 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Jennaye, don't bother. Although they would never admit it, most of these Boalt bashers are actually Boalt rejects. Nothing like a rejection letter to ruffle their feathers. Be proud that you are not a one-dimensional applicant, that you had more than your numbers to offer. In the long-run, it really doesn't matter what these people say. Do what you already plan to do and then kick ass at OCI! I'll contact you on LSD so we can talk more. Congratulations! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247297) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:21 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Actually, I didn't even apply to boalt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247310) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:26 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247331) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Congratulations! I'm happy that you will be attending a school that you seem to like. I like my school, and feel no need to belittle other people's school selection. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247352) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:30 PM Author: Salmon crawly hissy fit that's nice, but you still got owned. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249682) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:31 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Unfortunately, the numbers you reference for me are incorrect. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247367) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:47 PM Author: Fishy Stirring Abode Subject: 174 OUTED THE SECRET LIFE OF Ici Liu, ROOM #
Taken from an online messageboard which Ici frequents, these excerpts from his posts reveal your innocent hallmate for who he really is—an insecure twit who likes to get into online arguments about the evil of pre-marital sex and the prestige of his “C. Prescott Davis” scholarship. His board aliases are ElGreco, HailSEASer, 322yale, and dozens of others. Yes, he makes up multiple imaginary personas to stick up for him in cyberspace. Because he needs imaginary online friends.
For reasons already widely-known by the regs on this board (in addition to the various lurkers, Athenian, wolverinee, Fanatic, etc), it has already been proven why I am undoubtably and undeniably elite. In addition to all this, I have the strong backing of DBZ, the other pwner on this board, who is welcome to post *HIS* reason(s) as to why he owns all of you.
1) The loser-fucker dogfucker took my prose word-for-word without citation, meaning that my word is so superior, he thought it would make him sound smarter by using it directly. Proof of my success. My prose is admired. It is glorified. People fucking WANT to be me.
2) I attend the uber-prestigious Columbia University as a C. Prescott Davis scholar, being already (without even factoring GPA), at the top 3% of my class. Loser-fucker Fanatic even undeniably acknowledged my eliteness. Yes, whether you like it or not, SEAS is a part of Columbia, and by acknowleging the prestige of Columbia University, you are also acknowledging the fact that I am intelligent, elite, etc. Besides, the mere fact that I am a scholar puts me in front of all the non-scholar Columbia College students. You lose either way, and I always win. HTH
3) I am Asian (more specifically Chinese), so I am automatically recognized to be intelligent. I don't even need to show people a resume for them to think I'm smart. Both DBZ and I are members of the future elite race that will dominate the world.
4) My resume is as high quality & long as as a black phallus is to you sex-obsessed dipshits. The quality & quanity of my various positions definitely speaks for itself in terms intelligence, skills, etc. Back when this elite list was still available for viewing, an old reg will be able to acknowledge this obvious fact.
5) I have superior argumentation and logic skills. I am highly-intelligent, versatile, faithful, and most of all, powerful. Most you of loser-fuckers are even using the terms DBZ and I coined. You're often out of breath when you respond to my attacks, are unable to attack back, etc (Lao, Fanatic, GTO, etc) with logical and comprehensible arguments.
6) You losers-fuckers admire me. You have openly acknowledged my eliteness (hidden_hampster). I even have stalkers that track my accomplishments, whereabouts, even my screen name! You even consistently beg to talk to me AFTER being repeatedly blocked on AIM (crazybug).
7) Regarding my beliefs on sex and living a happy life of true love, none of you hold a candle to me. You merely back up the fact that the vast majority of you are non-virgins at age 18-22, a fucking disgrace. The mere fact that about 98% of the world population is NOT a virgin before marriage already puts me at the top 2% of the world. You guys are fucking funny when it comes to debating virginity.
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=89996#1435201)
On gays:
Enjoy that cock in Hell, because the Bible says homosexuality as a sin. Nice knowing all you cock-suckers will bend over and get fucked all the time. FUCK OFF! GET A FUCKING LIFE ALREADY! STOP BENDING EACH OTHER AND TAKING IT IN THE ASS!
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=92410#1464817)
On “loser-fucker”:
Yes, I was the one that initiated widespread use of it. DBZ started the term, I implemented it. Any bitch-fuck that uses the term "losers-fuckers," "loser-fuckers," or any remote resemblance of the basic structure of those two words, is acknowledging the fact that both DBZ and I own this board. Thanks for your inquiry, and HTH.
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=89996#1436605)
This just scratches the surface. Ici has probably spent a good 6 hours a day everyday for the past two weeks on this messageboard. If you want a constant and prolonged source of entertainment, please go to www.xoxohth.com and filter thread titles for “ElGreco” under Expert mode. Most of what you will read will make you laugh. Some will make you cry. Oh, and be sure to mention your admiration of his mental acuity in person. He appreciates being told he “pwns” internet people.
--
Date: February 15th, 2005 4:30 AM
Author: 174 (You fuck crippled midget sheeps. )
STFU, I dont know who ElGreco is
--
Date: February 28th, 2005 2:17 PM
Author: 174 (You fuck crippled midget sheeps. )
I am not TTT DOWNY and I don't know anything about tuna. However I have been on this board for a long time and I was around way before ElGreco was outted and the shit hit the fan. I have talked to ElGreco on several occasions and was a firm supporter of the pwning of the bitches on the college board. Nothing more need be revealed about me. HTH
-- |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 2:42 AM Author: transparent box office newt It seems like one good form of board censorship would be to delete posts outing people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255134) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 11:08 AM Author: Misanthropic Curious Space sometimes it's called for. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255886) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 AM Author: Razzmatazz french chef i was going to apply to boalt and then i read your story (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247355) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:48 AM Author: crusty native "Although they would never admit it, most of these Boalt bashers are actually Boalt rejects."
they might not be boalt rejects, but that they care so much about boalt admissions suggests some weird psychological thing is at work.
it looks here that "the meanest fish," having finished only in the top 75% of his law school, has a psychological need to maintain his self-image. boalt admits a number of people with lsat scores lower than his, so it's suitable for his purposes.
"great teacher onizuka" is a guy with enough time on his hands to research and write a long article comparing job placement at all of the top schools. i mean, that's cool, and i'm looking forward to reading it ... i'm just saying.
"174" i think weighs about 98 pounds. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:23 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen Top 5% eh? You wouldn't be willing to place some money on this, would you? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247315) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:23 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Even better, if you don't make top 1/4 will you drop out? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247316) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:24 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen Nah, stick with the money... Just think about how much free money we could get off of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247321) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:25 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask I suspect she has no money whatsoever. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247322) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:27 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse face it boys, I have intelligence, money, looks, and now an acceptance to a T14 law school. What's wrong with your self esteem that makes it so difficult for you to accept that? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247335) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask I'm starting to this this whole thing was flame start to finish. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247357) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:59 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma DON'T MAKE ME CRY! I'LL GO TO PIECES!!!
:(
/no self-esteem |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:16 PM Author: Amethyst razzle field ya, ugly looks (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249138) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:25 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Sure, name your price. I graduated cum laude undergrad easily. Grades are a piece of cake for those with an ounce of intelligence and who are willing to work for them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247323) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:25 AM Author: Cerise main people flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247327) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:27 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo has to be (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247336) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:27 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen Yeah this has got to be flame. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247338) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:28 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Yeah, that one jumped the shark. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247347) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:26 AM Author: Contagious yapping sandwich kitchen You realize that in law school, even at Dolt, you're not going to have 20-50% of every class full of slackers who don't give a fuck about their grade because they just want to fulfill a gen ed requirement, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247332) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:28 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Hmmm... and yet everyone on this board is telling me Boalt only accepts slackers with poor LSATs.
A bit contradictory, aren't we?
Maybe you should brush up on that LR. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "Maybe you should brush up on that LR."
Definitely flame. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:17 PM Author: Amethyst razzle field boat accepts hard workers with mediocre intelligence (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249149) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:29 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247354) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:30 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247362) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:03 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma I envy you. I got pwned over and over again in number theory, advanced physical chemistry, and transport phenomena, despite working at least 14 hours a day.
What was your secret??? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:30 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Not taking such useless classes (for wanting a career as a lawyer). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247544) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:38 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma So basically, to take easy classes.
EDIT: By the way, congrats on Boalt, I am pretty fond of Berkeley in general, I'm sure that you'll have a great time there. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:51 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "Not taking such useless classes (for wanting a career as a lawyer)."
Wow. Do you even know about IP and how much demand there is for it? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:56 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Actually I am pretty happy for the poster, I like to see people with a lot of worldly experience and social conscious get into good schools.
However, he/she claims, "...grades are a piece of cake for those with an ounce of intelligence and who are willing to work for them..."
This is a phenomenally arrogant statement. I don't think that I could even make it out of Caltech, where hard-core math and physics are mandatory. My humanities double major was a fucking cakewalk, with literally about 1/20th as much work as my engineering major. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:11 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Ouch, you went to Caltech? That is unfortunate, given that the students are brilliant and the curve is impossible.
But her statement that your hard science classes were "useless classes for law school" truly demonstrates her idiocy.
But both worldly experience and social consciousness shouldn't be huge factors. Makes law school too political, rather than based on potential. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:23 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma No, I went to Yale. But take a poster like Joe '04, who has a near 4.0 from Caltech-- I don't care if he struts around (not saying that he does, but hypothetically...), because frankly you have to brilliant to pull that off at CalT.
But how can anyone realistically weigh GPA? For example, in my engineering class, there were five (5) people. Everyone was weeded out after an incredibly difficult math courses, and the only five left were pretty damn smart. Even THEY found the curriculum almost intolerable. Every B+ was a fucking victory; every A- was cause for total celebration. Not even sure if anyone even got As. In one of my classes, the prof simply gave everyone Ds.
Now compare this to my English classes, in which you could B.S. a paper together in a few hours and carry away at least an A-...
I don't like the LSAT either, but at least it's something related to law school and equalizes the playing field. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:25 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Exactly. Besides, college is where you're supposed to find what you're good at. So should someone really be penalized for trying a hard science?
The LSAT really isn't that bad of a test, BTW. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:33 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Yeah, I feel that if you don't learn it in college, you probably won't be given another chance in your life. And hard sciences definitely serve up a big slice of humble pie. I am still, in fact, finishing up my slice.
From what I understand, the LSAT is one of the best standardized tests (in terms of correlation with 1L performance). I guess I'm just not a huge believer in standardized tests in general.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:32 AM Author: Razzmatazz french chef Thanks all --
RM: For now, Boalt is my first choice (well, it's my only choice as far as law schools go for now). Even if I got into GULC and UCLA, it'd still probably be my first choice.
wow |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:38 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247385) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:57 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Yeah, some people choose quality-of-life over corporate-whorism.
Amazing, isn't it?
jennaye |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:32 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask The fact that you ever thought that the three schools were comparable speaks of Boalt's TTTness. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247551) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:43 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse I thought they were comparable in terms of where I'd like to live. That's one of my biggest criteria for LS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247581) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:08 AM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank To 174 -- if I were you, I wouldn't advertise that you got into HLS. You make them look stupid for having accepted you. Immaturity, ineptitude, and haughtiness that one would only expect from Princeton (how much do you pay for the 3.9 grade inflation? oh no, because the averages are so high they're curbing them!)... that's called TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247484) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:23 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Less than 10% of my class had 3.9+. Maybe my undergrad wasn't Princeton, but I earned my grades and sat comfortably at the top of the curve knowing that my A's weren't given to me because my daddy and the dean were dorm roomies (and God knows what else!)back in the 60's. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247526) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:25 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo why was this said (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247530) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:28 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Grammar lessons from a TTT:
Questions are usually followed by a question mark.
HTH. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:33 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo You didn't point out that I didn't capitalize the w in Why dumbshit. I never said you were a TTT, but it seems that everytime you talk, you are just trying to convince yourself that you are worthy of where you are at instead of this board.
This board will always think you are TTT, so stop trying to argue it. It is a waste of ur time. I am sure you can find more grammatical errors in this post as well so have at it. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:38 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale I don't particularly care what this board thinks of me. Their opinion has no bearing on my opinion of myself, my academic achievements or professional aspirations.
Grammar Lessons and Internet Customs from a TTT:
I did not point out your capitalization error because it is customary not to capitalize on discussion boards. However, even those who do not capitalize usually add a period at the end of sentences, a comma when they are making a list, or a question mark when they are asking a question. This is done, you know, for clarity. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:45 AM Author: cyan seedy weed whacker water buffalo are you kidding me?????????????????????????????????????????????????
I really don't want to get into this with you, because you are such an easy target. Good luck with school.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247596) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: crusty native don't sweat these guys. your getting into boalt shakes their world for upsetting their narrow notions of meritocracy.
these are likely people lacking "soft factors" not just in law school admissions, but in life (e.g. charm, ability to attract the opposite sex) -- a shortcoming that they've always thought they could make up for by their academic achievements. your admission to a top law school with a relatively modest lsat score basically tells them that the only thing they're good at in the world doesn't fucking mean shit. it's easy to see why that's upsetting -- they know that this just foreshadows their future failures in the profession, when their intellectual achievements will be overshadowed by their utterly "TTT" social skills.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:34 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma "...ability to attract the opposite sex..."
Ouch! I have always been a proponent of AA for ugly people for this very reason. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:26 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown Law school is *completely* different. I will deviate from the other comments on this board and congratulate you on your acceptance and wish you good luck. But in all honesty, you have to know that you don't deserve to be there. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247533) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:28 AM Author: diverse glassy knife ape But she had glowing letters of rec. She deserved it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247538) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:31 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown I don't care if she was Jesus Christ reincarnated. A 155 doesn't cut it, even *looking past* the numbers.
(I know you're being sarcastic) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:32 AM Author: diverse glassy knife ape (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247549) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:31 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "I will deviate from the other comments on this board and congratulate you on your acceptance and wish you good luck. But in all honesty, you have to know that you don't deserve to be there."
See, if she just admitted this I would have no objections. But instead, she acts as though this was her "royal right" due to her high GPA. That's total crock as any intelligent person knows. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:31 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown Agreed. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247548) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:34 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask See, my scholarship was completely undeserved. But when I announced it I admitted it. I didn't talk about my bullshit publication or "special" study abroad and acted like I deserved it. Because I knew I just got lucky as hell. That's why I didn't get this sort of reaction. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247557) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:34 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale The determination of whether someone deserves to be admitted to a certain law school is made by the admissions committee of that school. Obviously, they thought she deserved it. What gives anyone but the ad com the right to say whether an applicant deserves to be admitted? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247555) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:39 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "The determination of whether someone deserves to be admitted to a certain law school is made by the admissions committee of that school."
True, but its made based on certain factors which are well known to everyone. This is what makes the admissions process somewhat fair. It is also true that the LSAT, which is taken by everyone who applies and is curved against other test takers is weighted more heavily than GPA, because GPA cannot account for numerous things such as toughness of major, luck with professors, etc. Thus, I had semesters where I had tons of hard sciences and got a 2.7, but other semesters where I took cake classes and got a 4.0 with less effort.
"Obviously, they thought she deserved it."
Which is exactly why they're TTT. Now, hey, if she were cool and was like "crap, how lucky was I?" I'd say cool, congrats. Instead, she acts like she had this coming for her great performance, which is simply not true.
"What gives anyone but the ad com the right to say whether an applicant deserves to be admitted?"
Ad comms and law schools don't exist in a vacuum, but instead exist as an integral part of the legal system.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:42 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse stop making excuses for your TTT GPA
HTH |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:44 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask I had a 3.5, which isn't exactly TTT. I also had a 169 LSAT, which is the difference between poor and pretty good. My numbers fairly indicated that I could hope to get into a school in the range of the one I attend (granted, with little or no $$$s). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247583) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:57 AM Author: crusty native the way you've been parading around, i thought you had hit at least, ahem, 174. not applying to boalt was a smart cost-saving measure. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247616) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:06 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask You mean because I got into 2 higher ranking schools with $$$s ? Yes, you're right. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247637) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:53 AM Author: crusty native this is like when i brag about my high sat score.
you should put that shit on your resume for oci next year. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:11 AM Author: nofapping concupiscible national security agency persian You do realize that OCI is based on a very few factors and school quality is by far the most important?
Also, you would put a scholarship on your resume: it would indicate a possibile reason (true or not) you had chosen a lower-ranked school than you were able to get into, because they gave you money. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:17 AM Author: crusty native "You do realize that OCI is based on a very few factors and school quality is by far the most important?"
umm, i've gone through oci. sure, school quality is important, but not so important as to exaggerate marginal differences between top schools. these geeks are crying over boalt versus penn.
"Also, you would put a scholarship on your resume"
to me that would scream "tool," especially if it's a penn student saying that he had gotten into chicago with money or something like that. we're not talking about chicago versus your local TTT here.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:21 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Natural High, did you go to Berkeley? (I have a friend who is quite interested in going there). (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247743) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:31 AM Author: crusty native heh yes, i love this place. berkeley is one of my favorite places on earth. i highly recommend it for anyone who wants to actually have a positive law school experience and didn't get into yale or stanford.
has your friend gotten in already? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:37 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Not yet, he won't be applying for at least one cycle. I seem to remember that we had a short debate a while ago about over Boalt and LSAT scores, needless to say I have made a 180 turn after learning that one of my friends (who is VERY intelligent and articulate) took a ten point hit in his LSATs. So this made to make me rethink my opinion on Berkeley adcom, especially since I'm very sure that he could litigate circles around me, LSAT notwithstanding.
Hopefully you'll still be on the board in a few months, I might want to hit you up for some questions. Thanks :) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:42 AM Author: crusty native cool, best of luck to your friend.
i'm pretty familiar with the way admissions work at boalt. it's not propaganda when i say that they do care very much about soft factors. like any other school, a certain number of people get in on sheer magnitude of lsat/gpa -- but at boalt, this is a pretty small number, and anyone who's not an auto-admit has his/her file looked at by a faculty member and at least one student adcomm member. the people on the adcomm debate over each and every candidate -- everyone who gets in off committee has been carefully vetted. of course, every once in awhile a "low" lsat person will get in and upset the people on this board. :) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:54 AM Author: nofapping concupiscible national security agency persian Thanks for this (and any other thoughts that you choose to share on the school). The reason I keep coming back to this board is for stories and impressions about law schools that haven't been comletely vetted by the schools' respective adcomms.
I've read lots of interest on most of the top schools, but very little about Boalt (other than mindless bashing). I know that all of the top schools are good, and provide excellent oppurtunities, but it's the personal views that I value for learning about quality of life and general attitudes on the campus. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:25 AM Author: nofapping concupiscible national security agency persian No, I meant mentioning a scholarship you received at the school that you matriculated at. Not every random scholarship you were awarded.
Edit: anyway, my comment came up because those are simply factors that seem unavoidable during recruitment, which is why I though it odd that you brought them up. As you say, this board magnifies the differences between the schools. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:27 AM Author: crusty native oh okay, yeah, i'm with you on that one.
(sorry, i'm slow right now because i'm a little drunk.)
edit: i brought it up because i thought he was putting down boalt admits on the basis that he had gotten money at two higher-ranked schools even though he has been doing poorly at his own school. i was just saying that it doesn't matter for oci that he was offered a scholarship at, say, chicago if he's bottom 25% at, say, penn. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale You make some valid points. Humility is key. Any person, regardless of scores, backgroud, or life experience is lucky to get into law school. I think that most people who get into Boalt with sub 160 LSAT's, including myself, know that they got extremely lucky. However, knowing you got lucky and feeling deserving of an admission are not mutually exclusive.
Yes, I will admit, I got lucky. Many people with my numbers were turned away. Do I think I deserve it? Well, the ad com seemed to think so, and that, to me is the opinion that matters.
You're right, law school admissions do not exist in a vacuum, but I think that we can all agree that each law school has a bit of a different environment (social, academic, etc.) and each school looks for certain qualities in an applicant that it feels will fit their mold. Why do people with low LSAT's get admitted to Berkeley when they are not admitted at any of the other T14's? I think it's because Berkeley is willing to make a numbers sacrifice to get those subjective qualities they deem important.
BTW, I promised a friend of mine I would stop defending our school on internet discussion boards. So if you're looking at this, sorry. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:54 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247610) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:02 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse well said! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247625) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:03 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "Any person, regardless of scores, backgroud, or life experience is lucky to get into law school."
But its not all equivalent. Someone with a 3.9/179 who gets into Boalt doesn't really need to display the same sort of humility. Anyone in their position can expect admissions to most T14s. Someone with a 3.9/~160 cannot. Those are generally #21-50 numbers.
"You're right, law school admissions do not exist in a vacuum, but I think that we can all agree that each law school has a bit of a different environment (social, academic, etc.) and each school looks for certain qualities in an applicant that it feels will fit their mold"
See, I've realized that I'm fine accepting this. I just hope that rankings will soon recognize Boalt's approach and take it into account. If Boalt was a #20-25 school, I'd have no issue with them.
"Why do people with low LSAT's get admitted to Berkeley when they are not admitted at any of the other T14's? I think it's because Berkeley is willing to make a numbers sacrifice to get those subjective qualities they deem important."
Right, which is why they should be a very socially conscious rank #20-25 school. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:34 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale The same methodology that keeps Boalt in the top 14 seems to keep most of you happy with regard to the placement of other schools. If you were to tweak the rankings in such a manner that would place Boalt in the 20-25 range, other T14 schools would pay the price as well.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 7:22 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "The same methodology that keeps Boalt in the top 14 seems to keep most of you happy with regard to the placement of other schools. If you were to tweak the rankings in such a manner that would place Boalt in the 20-25 range, other T14 schools would pay the price as well."
I'm not saying adjust the rankings, I'm saying I hope they get adjusted to their fair value in the rankings as their numbers, employment stats, and reputation drop. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:06 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma I like that Berkeley is making a numbers sacrifice. I have many friends who did inexplicably bad on the LSAT, but are otherwise brilliant in many respects. I think that they would make great lawyers, better than me, certainly.
But to hear any kind of split (high GPA / low LSAT or the converse) actively boast as if one factor doesn't matter is fairly unsettling. I have just the opposite problem (99.9% LSAT / B+ GPA) but I would never boast about getting into any of the T14, because I *know* that my GPA is sub-par and that my application is thus flawed in a major way. I certainly don't say that GPA is a useless metric, and this is what the poster seems to be implying about the LSAT. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:09 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse who's boasting? I'm just saying that I'm pretty fucking happy, as you would be if you got into a T14. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247644) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:18 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma Sorry, my bad. I was mainly referring to your statement about how easy it was to score cum laude (taken in context, you would be calling me "without an ounce of intelligence" as I did work hard for my grades but didn't find it a "piece of cake") I'm sure that if I were talking to you in real life, the thought wouldn't cross my mind...text can be pretty ambiguous.
Again, congratulations on Berkeley, I'm sure you're a very interesting/cool person to hang out with. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:22 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse No, if I met you in real life I'd probably be very aloof and not give you the time of day. And if I did, you probably would not find me cool nor interesting.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:23 AM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma sad :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247666) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:32 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse hey, we can't help who we are (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247678) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:30 PM Author: Amethyst razzle field must be your "looks"
wahahahaha |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:28 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown "No, if I met you in real life I'd probably be very aloof and not give you the time of day"
You sound like such a great person. Way to go Berkeley! |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:52 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247605) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:40 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown You're hurting your future school:
From Dean Berring:
Before you read about it in the press, I wanted to share some news with you. The annual US News rankings are being released today, and show Boalt dropping from 10th to 13th overall. I could regale you with tales of the invalidity of the rankings, indeed the deans of all but two American law schools have signed on to a letter protesting them, but the fact is that the press loves them. Thirteenth overall is just not an accurate reflection of who we are.
I remain quite optimistic. Our IP program retained its first place ranking among specialty programs. In the two categories that are generally considered the most important: reputation in the profession and reputation among academics, we remain solidly in the top five. And, the data that goes into this survey is as much as a year old. What really hurt us this year are some of the categories based on resources. We have made enormous progress these last twelve months.
The best part is that Chris Edley, the dean-designate, is already at work with the Central Campus to increase our resources. He has ambitious plans in place to improve almost every aspect of the school, including those areas that are most prominently featured in the US News report. I am confident that next year's rankings will show a marked improvement, and Chris will not be satisfied until we are at the top. Of course, he will need to rely on your support now more than ever to be successful. Then we can still berate the rankings, but with a smile on our face.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:51 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247603) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:35 AM Author: crusty native "See, if she just admitted this I would have no objections."
Seriously though, why do you need her to "admit" this? I mean, who cares? We all agree that Boalt's admissions seem idiosyncratic compared to peer schools ... what do YOU get out of putting the "random"/soft-factors/whatever admits down? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:49 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask It just says something about a person. If someone lucks out and act like they deserved it all along then they come off like an ass. This isn't hard to understand. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247598) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:52 AM Author: crusty native "It just says something about a person."
Sure, I can grant you that. I'm just not seeing why that matters to you or why you've displaced your negative energy toward particular individuals to an entire school. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:58 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Honestly, I'm just flaming for shits and giggles. I'm done with the admissions process, and have been for over a year, so I really don't care. But I'm pissed because I'm an overworked, sick 1L who has a morning class and still has to read like 70 pages tonight. I just figured I'd take it out on some clueless poster. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247617) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:39 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse I don't think it was my "royal right" to get into Boalt, nor do I think I don't deserve to be there. I think I was an applicant with a mediocre LSAT score, great academics, LORs, and other soft factors that added up to what the adcomms thought was worth an acceptance.
That said, who's to say who deserves what?
Oh right, apparently the adcomms. And they said I deserve admission to Boalt. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:41 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown See above post. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247576) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:46 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask And what a great job they're doing. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247588) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:42 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "That said, who's to say who deserves what?"
A guy with a 2.0/143 gets into Boalt. But he did a cool summer abroad to Spain one year and had great recs. I mean really glowing. You okay with this?
Keep in mind, this does affect the school. If they accept too many people like you they'll continue to fall in the rankings and continue to underperform in hiring stats. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:48 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse You're completely misrepresenting the situation. I'm not saying that luck didn't factor in to my acceptance, but I'm also not saying that I didn't deserve it. If my dad's connections got me in, then I would agree it was undeserved.
"People like me" -- you mean intelligent, intellectual, socially conscious people who graduate with high honors, cum laude, hold prestigious internships, leadership positions, etc?
Yes, clearly I'm a failure. They'd be much better off accepting some frat boy who drank beer and partied for four years, but scored a 172 on some standardized test. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:56 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "They'd be much better off accepting some frat boy who drank beer and partied for four years, but scored a 172 on some standardized test."
See, you presume, without justification, that LSAT score is meaningless. That its luck of the draw, that any idiot can walk in and score a 172. But what you don't see is that your BS english lit classes have little to do with LS while the LSAT tests exactly what matters. That's, you know, why they bother with the test.
"I'm also not saying that I didn't deserve it"
And you're wrong. Your numbers do not represent T14 numbers. I'll tell you what: if you can repeat this and get into another T14 I'll concede defeat.
""People like me" -- you mean intelligent, intellectual, socially conscious people who graduate with high honors, cum laude, hold prestigious internships, leadership positions, etc?"
Intelligent - frankly, not according to the LSAT.
Intellectual - nice patting yourself on the back!
socially conscious - Law schools don't and shouldn't care about this.
high honors, cum laude, hold prestigious internships, leadership positions - The former two are related to your high GPA. Yes, we know, it was high. The latter two are just standard extras. They're certainly not enough to generally propel someone with your numbers to a T14. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:00 AM Author: diverse glassy knife ape Socially Conscious = flaming liberal. A large reason why she was accepted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247619) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:04 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask True. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247631) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:05 AM Author: crusty native "See, you presume, without justification, that LSAT score is meaningless. That its luck of the draw, that any idiot can walk in and score a 172."
my god, shut the fuck up. i got a higher lsat score, and a higher gpa in a hard science. you think that just because you got a 169, which is admittedly an amazing score (ha ha), you would've rocked boalt if you had gone there? not fucking likely, 25 percenter. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:08 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247641) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:08 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask I have no doubt I would have done better surrounded by much less capable students. I also would've done better if not for ONE bad prof. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247642) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:28 AM Author: crusty native top 50%?
okay, seriously, i'm not an asshole and i feel kind of bad for riding on you for your poor semester. what i do think is ridiculous, though, is when xoxo posters get all bent out of shape over the admissions of a school that clearly has chosen to pursue an aggregate applicant profile a little different from its peer schools.
boalt gets enough apps to easily fill its seats with more or less the same moderately high lsat/low gpa people as other non-HYS schools, but it is a public school and its administration has decided that it wants to produce a bunch of "community" lawyers to serve the state of california. in spite of the vitriol on this board, it can probably get away with this and still remain a top school because it still produces a ton of the typical corporate lawyers that will go on and review documents competently. so my question is -- why do you guys care so fucking much about it? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:51 PM Author: insanely creepy forum "I have no doubt I would have done better surrounded by much less capable students. I also would've done better if not for ONE bad prof."
HAHAHAHAHAHA!
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:15 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse "See, you presume, without justification, that LSAT score is meaningless. That its luck of the draw, that any idiot can walk in and score a 172. But what you don't see is that your BS english lit classes have little to do with LS while the LSAT tests exactly what matters. That's, you know, why they bother with the test."
I think that the con law and legal theory classes I took had a good deal to do with LS.
"And you're wrong. Your numbers do not represent T14 numbers. I'll tell you what: if you can repeat this and get into another T14 I'll concede defeat."
Again with the numbers!! Perhaps my LSAT isn't "T14" quality, but clearly my application is T14 material.
You all need to stop seeing the LSAT as the be-all and end-all of the universe. Of course when I scored a 160 I was like "wtf?" But luckily, the adcomms at Berkeley believe that it's not indicative of my intelligence.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:18 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "I think that the con law and legal theory classes I took had a good deal to do with LS."
Oooh, Ugrad legal classes. I took those. Got straight As. Doesn't mean shit.
"You all need to stop seeing the LSAT as the be-all and end-all of the universe. Of course when I scored a 160 I was like "wtf?" But luckily, the adcomms at Berkeley believe that it's not indicative of my intelligence."
Its not my fault they're wrong. Here's the problem, you either:
-- Can't read
-- Don't know basic logic
-- Or aren't smart enough to do games
Any of which is terrible for law school and means much more than any cakewalk Ugrad class. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:16 PM Author: Alcoholic Amber Kitty Stage UG Legal Classes are TTT.
No wonder you are so proud of them. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 7:19 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse actually, they were graduate level courses.
HTH
(oh, and work on the "assumption" questions for your LR) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 7:23 PM Author: Alcoholic Amber Kitty Stage I scored in the 99th percentile.
HTH. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 8:18 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse And I care because....? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2252259) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 7:23 PM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask "actually, they were graduate level courses."
Grad level? What is that, like American Law for English Lit MAs? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:59 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247618) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:45 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247587) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:51 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse didn't get a 155. Might want to work on the RC. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247602) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:00 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247620) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:01 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse rowww!
down boy! |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 11:22 PM Author: insanely creepy forum "My 174 indicates my RC is excellent."
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:53 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Once again, I did not have a 155. Furthermore, I was not a liberal arts major. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247607) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:01 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247624) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:09 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247645) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:31 PM Author: Amethyst razzle field 180! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249689) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 12:31 PM Author: Passionate Gay Personal Credit Line WTF!?!?!? 10%!?!?!? 3.9 is usually 4% at any decent college, and less than 2% in any science..... can you say inflated!!?!? 10% is usually like a 3.75. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2248856) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:05 PM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Hurting in the reading comprehension department, aren't we, TTT dreams? I said LESS THAN 10%.
Here's a math lesson from a TTT:
4% < 10% 2% < 10%
I said less than 10% because I do not know the exact figure for this year. For my graduating class, I believe the figure was less than 5%.
HTH. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:29 PM Author: Passionate Gay Personal Credit Line I'm not the one whose reading comp is so bad that she scored a 157. Please, my fucking german shepherd outscored you by ten percentile points. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2250110) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:53 PM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale I only got one wrong on the RC section. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2250831) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 5:38 PM Author: Passionate Gay Personal Credit Line Yeah, and I suppose your 157 was just arbitrarily assigned, regardless of how many questions you got wrong. I call BULLSHIT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2251287) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 7:20 PM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale I would never assert anything so ridiculous. RC was my best section. My score is the result of bombing the games. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2251883) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 7:49 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital what did you do? miss 22 of 23????? jesus (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2252047) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 8:38 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2252398) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:43 PM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Apparently your LR skills, despite your LSAT score, are severely lacking.
I said I missed 1 on RC. That leaves two sections of LR and one LG.
I feel no obligation to explain this to you any further. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 8:40 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king "Here's a math lesson from a TTT."
The sad thing is, this is probably the actual extent of Ruskie's math abilities. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:27 AM Author: crusty native 174 is not "real." It's just some wacky persona created by some emotionally imbalanced guy to compensate for his real-life inadequacies. You know -- you could be a pimply virgin in real life, but online you're a badass shit-talking HLS admit looking down on the masses from your lofty perch. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247535) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:48 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247591) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:30 AM Author: diverse glassy knife ape Subject: Boalt's <160 admits... Already turning on each other. Just imagine the intellectual debates they will get into once they matriculate. Soon Boalt will have an all out shit flinging fest on their hands.
http://www.lawschooldiscussion.org/prelaw/index.php/topic,26967.msg395007.html#msg395007 |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:00 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Wow, 189 comments all about my acceptance to Boalt.
I think GULC should accept me just to see the feeding frenzy on xoxo. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:03 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247627) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:10 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse ....207 comments! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247646) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:12 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask You should email this to the adcomms. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247651) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:17 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Go for it. I haven't said anything I would be ashamed for them to see. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247657) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:19 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Like I care enough to do this.
Besides, I strongly believe in keeping board feuds on the board. I merely do this for fun. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:21 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Man, your life must be one wild ride.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:25 AM Author: bossy zombie-like area pocket flask Once you start 1L yours will be too. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247671) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 4:28 AM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king Maybe not- she's going to Dolt. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2247674) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 7:24 PM Author: primrose vibrant state I don't think you have a chance in hell at georgetown. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2259244) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:29 PM Author: Thirsty stimulating patrolman corner Subject: college boarder checking in... "Thanks pal, but it wasn't entirely good forture. I had a stellar application, aside from my LSAT."
way to be modest, cunt. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 1:30 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital oh, its hard to be modest with such an awesome LSAT
(does she know what stellar means?) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:20 PM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank To the Meanest Fish: You know, I have never seen someone exude so much insecurity in my life. Your pitiful 3.5 and 169 is nothing to be cocky about, especially one who to criticize people for not "admitting" low stats. 3.5 is what... 4 years of B+/A-'s? Having earned a 4.0-equivalent at MIT, I can truly say that hard science isn't truly hard; don't justify yourself in a pre-law forum just because most haven't taken it. And a 169? That's honestly a good score, but you only got six-eight more questions correct than Whd.
I'm sorry if your 3.5 couldn't get you into Boalt. Priding yourself CONSITENTLY that you got into "two" T14's "higher" than Boalt (based on USNWR rankings? wow, your 169 and logical reasoning was DEFINITELY a fluke) isn't really justifying yourself either. You got into a school that honors 4 hours higher than 4 years.
And I really feel sorry for your 1L class AND professors. Do you have friends? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:26 PM Author: Twinkling Karate Doctorate dude, at least he's honest about his background. you obviously didn't go to MIT, so stop the BS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249648) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:50 PM Author: carmine chest-beating property tank Sorry Tsunami, I did... care to discuss? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249831) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:30 PM Author: Exhilarant Flatulent Juggernaut Dilemma You only say that because you haven't met me, I am unbelievably insecure :( (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249675) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:40 PM Author: crusty native I think science is freaking hard too. This guy must be a genius. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249765) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:36 PM Author: crusty native His reasoning ability unsurprisingly landed him in the bottom 25% of his class after one semester ... no wonder he clings on to past glories.
I wouldn't even give a shit except that he displaces his negative energy on to these totally idiotic political attacks on the way Boalt does admissions. Hey, we all got to feel better than someone else, right?
"And I really feel sorry for your 1L class ..."
I don't. They're lucky to have someone consistently bring up the rear on the curve. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:26 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks Subject: i got dinged from boalt on first review 3.75/167
am I entitled to feel bitter? and who are the ad coms at Boalt? it would piss me off greatly if some 3.8/160 student had any influence on my app |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:39 PM Author: crusty native If you got dinged on first review, that means no student got to look at your app, and you were dinged by an admissions professional or a professor. I'm not sure how that'd be any better though. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249750) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:41 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks Subject: an "admissions professional" i don't like the sound of that at all; elaborate that one if you can
and who are the profs on the com? i could my app turning off a certain subset of the fac |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:49 PM Author: crusty native I mean someone who works in the admissions office, someone like the dean of admissions -- like at any other school. Nothing weird there.
The adcomm has professors spanning the ideological spectrum, but yeah, it's random who looks at your app. They're not supposed to base their decisions on political orientation, obviously. And once you're in committee multiple people look at your app so as to minimize any one person's influence -- they all have to agree to admit or ding you. The adcomm is not a bunch of hippies that only let in other hippies; if you check out the composition of any one class you'd find a lot of conservatives and a bunch of IP/techie people.
What did you have on your app? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:51 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks discussed my interest in applying economics to environmental policy; have training/experience in both areas
i thought it was pretty strong |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:58 PM Author: crusty native That doesn't sound so objectionable to me -- I mean, so as to turn off segments of the faculty.
I'm sorry about your ding. That shit's subjective and unpredictable ... especially at Boalt I guess.
Are you going to go to UCLA or go out of state now? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:01 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks appreciate the nice words about my ding. would have been thrilled to have gone to berkeley, which was far and away my first choice
as it turns out, i'm going to CHicago. guess they dug the PS. the irony, of course, is that my numbers are more "Boaltish" than Chicagoish. bizarre. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 3:07 PM Author: crusty native "guess they dug the PS."
Ha ha, must've been that econ thing.
When I was applying, I got the impression that Chicago admissions were a little weird too. After I applied using their very short form, they sent me another, far longer application form to fill out, and invited me to an "optional" interview.
Glad that between two schools with weird admissions, one worked out for you. |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:39 PM Author: Vigorous orchid parlor faggot firefighter Sure, bitterness is certainly in order. Don't worry, though, I'm sure you'll be better off. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2249751) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:05 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:42 PM Author: insanely creepy forum Dear 174,
FYI's:
1. It is TTT to boast.
2. It is especially TTT to boast about LSAT scores.
3. It is exceptionally TTT to boast about an LSAT score of 174.
4. It is TTT to refer to Boalt as "Dolt."
5. It is TTT to post the following sentence on a public message board: "We regret to inform you that we had many qualified applicants and as such are unable to offer you a spot in our incoming class."
6. It is TTT not to know why it is TTT to post that sentence.
7. It is TTT to boast about your 3.9 from Princeton and 174 LSAT if you do not know why #5 is TTT.
HTH.
|
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 10:46 PM Author: Vigorous orchid parlor faggot firefighter Actually, you're completely wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2253475) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 11:04 PM Author: insanely creepy forum HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2253665) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 2:46 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks Subject: admissions professional like the black dude whose head is about to get blown off by Eastwood by a possibly-unloaded .357, "I gots ta know"
who are these fucks? |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2005 11:31 PM Author: dashing dun people who are hurt hunting ground Subject: s What a worthless thread.
You should all be ashamed of yourselves. All of you.
:::ponders why we call it "taking a dump," when we're "leaving a dump"::: |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 1:01 AM Author: Rose pervert double fault This chick should head to Vegas immediately with her run of luck. She doesn't seem to grasp the concept that there were more than likely TONS of applicants to Boalt with equally impressive non-LSAT credentials as she had, yet, who also had MUCH higher LSAT scores....I didn't care to read all these posts but is this chick a URM? If not, she should thank her lucky stars, gain some humility, and get ready to work her ass off lest she be torn a new one. ;) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2254607) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 1:27 AM Author: crusty native As much as I love Boalt, I don't particularly like that they let in white and Asian people with low LSAT scores (unless there were extenuating circumstances or if the applicants were truly awesome). I wish they could just practice AA. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2254751) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 2:31 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale What, in particular, bothers you about Asians with low LSAT scores? Not flaming, just curious. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255094) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 2:38 AM Author: Hyperactive insecure center quadroon Subject: why do ad coms admit dummies like you? doesn't the faculty get pissed when they discover that half of their students are idiots? doesn't the charm of admitting "personalities" wear off by thanksgiving? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255124) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 2:41 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale I suppose they prefer it to the charm of dealing with personalities like yourself. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255131) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 2:55 AM Author: Hyperactive insecure center quadroon i am quite charming, but that's beside the point. the professors laugh at how stupid you and your peers are. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255176) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:46 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale "i am quite charming, but that's beside the point. the professors laugh at how stupid you and your peers are."
With the moniker "beavis," I suspect you are at most half as charming as the inspirational cartoon character and that you get laid about half as much.
|
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 11:00 PM Author: jet gaping wagecucks Subject: you're oblivious to how dumb you are which is why you're a running joke here. hth. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2260742) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:18 AM Author: crusty native I don't have anything against Asian people.
I love Boalt and I agree completely with what they're trying to accomplish with the way they do admissions, both in terms of building a seriously kickass student community and making positive contributions to the public interest in California and beyond.
I just wish Boalt could practice AA, because the way it stands now, there are SOME pretty dim non-URMs that get admitted under the present regime.
I don't mean to suggest that everyone who got a modest LSAT is dumb -- I've met some really amazing people who have done very well academically in law school in spite of choking on LSAT day (and a bunch of 170s people at the bottom of the class) -- but I also know some total dumbasses who are both politically and mentally abhorrent.
I don't really like that those particular white and Asian people are at Boalt, because they tend to forget that it's a privilege to be at a top law school and that they were fortunate to have gotten in, and act like total assholes and look down on the URMs here.
Basically, I know that every law school is going to have a bunch of asshole-ish white and Asian students ... I just don't have any sympathy for people like that so it makes it worse for me that low-LSAT-scoring versions of those people sometimes manage to sneak in under Boalt's admissions system. If we're going to have pricks in law school, at least let them be intelligent, right? Collateral damage, I guess. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:42 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale I didn't mean to imply that you had anything against Asian people. I am sorry if I was unclear and came off that way.
I agree with basically everything you said. A few of those characters always slip through the cracks. I like to think we have less of them than other schools, but perhaps that is only wishfulthinking.
If the ad com had AA at their disposal, our student body would benefit from an increase in diversity of perspective -- something I feel we soemtimes lack.
Are you a 1L? |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:56 AM Author: crusty native Oh, I just wanted to clarify because your previous message asked if I had a problem with Asians with low LSATs and didn't mention white people.
I actually think that our school does have a wide range of perspectives. It's just that, as you know, certain viewpoints are openly expressed a lot more than others. I just can't stand it when objectively stupid people here put down the school or URMs, because they themselves wouldn't have gotten in if the school did not try to practice "comprehensive review."
Nah, I'm not a 1L, but I think you have a good class. What do you think of it? |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 4:48 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale Oops, sorry about that. I actually overlooked that you had mentioned white people in your post. Trying to pull an all-nighter to finish a brief having only slept 3 hours the night before will do that! I'm sitting here drinking those nasty Starbucks cold esspresso drinks and checking in on here to appease my ADD.
I think that our school definitely has a greater range than any place at which I have previously studied. It's a welcome change. But, like you said, some people are not as open about their viewpoints. Although I am a die-hard liberal, I often feel bad for the more conservative students I know, who often feel to intimidated or frustrated to contribute their views to the discourse at hand.
Yeah, our class is pretty good. A few bad apples here and there, but overall a good bunch. I love the people in my mod. At the BLF auction, we were singled out as the coolest, most close-knit mod. I keep hearing about intra-mod drama and conflict and am really glad I don't have to deal with that. My closest family member lives in Arizona, so much of the time, my mod is my upport system and my family. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 5:11 AM Author: crusty native I guess I don't feel that much sympathy for conservatives at Boalt. After all, conservatives pretty much dominate everything outside; three years of humble pie is nothing. You will suffer way more marginalization as a "die-hard liberal" in your lifetime than these guys in three years at Boalt. Yet, I bet they'd still end up angrier -- but that's just the way entitlement works.
Besides, there's the "Boalt Briefs," which is a vehicle for conservative white males who imagine themselves oppressed to passive-aggressively vent about shit ... kind of like this board.
The BLF Auction is an example of how Boalt is basically a paradise among law schools. I have friends at most of the top schools and they don't have anything like it. Boalt's pretty much a fantasy land for folks of a certain disposition.
Good luck on WOA! I'm out. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:54 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Wow, another omniscient xoxo'er. How, pray tell, do you know my non-LSAT credentials? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255273) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:45 PM Author: Rose pervert double fault I do not know your LSAT credentials my dear..care to share? If not, then it is valid to assume that they are not more impressive than most who apply to Boalt or any other top law school. Do you not understand that MANY applicants to top 10 law schools had leadership positions in extracurriculars, good personal statements, extremely impressive references, as well as work experience AND LSAT scores MUCH MUCH MUCH higher than yours? If you don't realize this, please reconsider your apparent decision to attend law school, and spare us all. HTH. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2257607) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2005 11:29 PM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse So then, pray tell, how did I get accepted to a T14? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2266147) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2005 12:57 AM Author: Rose pervert double fault From all we can tell from what you have shared my dear, the answer lies in my suggestion to you to high-tail it to Vegas...stat. HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2266645) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:48 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital "pray tell"
132 (or should i say 160?) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:08 AM Author: yellow wrinkle Subject: post #298 i like berkeley (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255202) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:09 AM Author: yellow wrinkle Subject: post #299 good bookstores, pretty views of the bay, good music playing somewhere (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255205) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:11 AM Author: yellow wrinkle Subject: and post #300 it's too bad that the school is a joke (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255208) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:53 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse yes, clearly that's why it's been a T14 for quite some time now. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255272) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 6:34 PM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown Not for long with admits like you. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2258881) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2005 3:23 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king It's also been in perpetual decline becuase it admits TTT students. Within 5 years it will be out of the T14. Once it breaks that threshold, there's no limit to the depths that Dolttt with plunge. HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2263262) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:29 AM Author: insanely creepy forum "it's too bad that the school is a joke"
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA! |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:54 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse YES!! The thread has been revived!! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255276) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:56 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse It's funny, because a couple days ago I posted my LSN url and asked people to bash me (trying not to get my hopes up before my Cal visit), and I got back encouraging remarks. Now that I'm in, it's luck.
Make up your minds, morons! |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:59 AM Author: Excitant toilet seat locale You must really enjoy the attention. Shortage in recent years? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2255282) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 4:15 AM Author: titillating harsh crackhouse Yes... my parents chained me up in the basement and made me eat out of a doggie dish.
It made for an excellent PS, though. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:54 PM Author: confused flesh philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2260657) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 6:38 AM Author: bright galvanic theatre clown Hottest HLS 1L at Mid Semester first stage?
Cassie M. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:41 AM Author: Abusive citrine address potus lil token,
i dont mean to sound rude, but how dare you accuse me of of some racist sh*it. i dont know a damn thing about SWB. i dont know her numbers, i dont know where all she got it, i dont know her race (though i am assuming for your ridiculous accusations of me that she is URM) WAY OUT OF LINE!
you better be F*CKING careful before you start throwing around racial stuff. that is a serious thing to accuse someone of and that is NOT COOL!!! i am so offended right now i can hardly think straight. i am SO SO SO SO not deffending jenns acceptance because she is white. the other side of that token being i am not saying SWB got in for other reasons other than her ability to do well. i frankly dont care about SWB accept for the fact that she and jenn are arguing a bit on here, and i was trying to ignore it.
the only point i have PERIOD is that boalts 25/75 numbers are thus: 3.65-3.9 160-168 an admit with a 160/3.87 doesn't seem so crazy...her numbers are RIGHT IN THERE, and eveyone always says if your numbers are in there for a school it is a target.
do not try to force what i am saying into a racial argument, lil_token. that is hitting way below the belt. |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 3:37 PM Author: Lascivious shitlib lil_token is ruskie. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2257531) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 10:59 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital you forgot: HTH (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2260727) |
|
Date: March 4th, 2005 11:02 PM Author: Lascivious shitlib That still doesn't change the fact that Ruskie is a whore. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2260760) |
|
Date: March 5th, 2005 9:31 PM Author: Rose pervert double fault This school was far from a "target" for her...plug her numbers into the LSDAS matrix and you'll see that she had an 11% chance of admission based on her stats alone and based on the previous year's admission cycle..obviously, other factors came into play...she was hardly "right in there". (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2265368) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2005 12:59 AM Author: purple fragrant love of her life for fuck's sake replace staff and students immediately (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2266655) |
|
Date: March 6th, 2005 9:53 PM Author: Aphrodisiac hospital BIZZUMP (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=143391&forum_id=2#2271783) |