Date: April 7th, 2006 3:07 PM Author: deep theater stage half-breed
i wrote on her how she and i were gonna hang out, i (apparently stupidly) posted a facebook pic that didnt link to her profile or anything (just a .jpg), and i said it seemed like she really wanted a bf and i (apparently stupidly) noted that i wanted to sleep with her. it all got back to her. talk about some serious pwning.
nah, you can still spin it in your favor. all the cards are on the table.. just act like nothing happened and it's no big deal, she'll eventually go along with it if you're cool about it.
Chicks like arrogant asshole guys, I have faith in you to spin this in your favor. Plus, if she was hot, and you were talking about it, you can just say how you were praising her hotness. Any references to her being a jewess, spin as; well you are, aren't you? Be confident young skywalker
absolutely not, my roomate last year was a kappa sig transfer from hofstra, and the kappa sig's there are quite different. he was a complete asshole, and talked down to girls, and came home with at least 20 different hot sluts over the course of the year. be the asshole, and trick them into sleeping with you thinking you are the asshole. Once you show you are truly a nice guy, they will actually grow sick of you. It is a paradox, but incredible. I have a 95% chance of getting laid by a hot Bulgarian chick tonight (have with 3 of her friends the past 4 Friday nights, 1 unsuccessful night) Be the asshole young jedi, wiser words have not graced the pages of xoxo
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:14 PM Author: translucent temple
No, it wasn't me. I can't even look at facebook, I don't think, because I don't have an account.
I don't know if I would have done it or not though. I think it's funny and I think it's deserved, but I don't like the idea of fucking with people's real lives.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:08 PM Author: deep theater stage half-breed
no, no, it's because i said she seemed like she really wanted a bf (i dont think i ever said 'desperate' and i didnt mean that, but whatever, that's the message she got) and i noted that i thought she was attractive and wanted to sleep with her.
not offensive exactly but not what you want someone to read.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:08 PM Author: Supple autistic indian lodge
i'm guessing some jerk-off here sent the chick the link to the thread.
which is the shittiest thing imaginable -- this board is supposed to be a sacred haven for the bored and/or antisocial. once people start forwarding outsiders links to what is discussed here the whole system falls apart!
jeez barzini, I just looked at the thread and you mention her nose job and your economic analysis of your twenty dollar date as opposed to getting a whore. That is terrible, terrible pwnage. I feel for you.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:55 PM Author: translucent temple
you may not see it that way, but that's because you're weird. I doubt any girl here, even the ugly, socially undesirable ones like me, would go out with a guy after reading messages like the ones you posted.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:16 PM Author: translucent temple
It wasn't me.
I may have planted the idea in some one's brain though since I suggested some one do it on the other thread. So if you want to string me up for being indirectly responsible, I don't care.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:20 PM Author: Supple autistic indian lodge
is there any way to find out who did it? i mean, if the chick is still talking to Don could she tell him where the email came from (i don't know how facebook works)?
seriously, this undermines the entire board, i really think GTO should ban the prick who would do something like this.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:28 PM Author: Supple autistic indian lodge
what would that solve?
i'm just saying that if someone dimed you out that's not the type of person who belongs in this forum (and we allow racists, antisemites, and individuals of that ilk).
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:16 PM Author: up-to-no-good space marketing idea
Wow Don. That is probably the worst pwnage on xoxo in a LONG time, considering the fact most of us here were rooting for you. Next time, be more careful.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:56 PM Author: up-to-no-good space marketing idea
Anything on xoxo is fair game. that has been proven time and time again by posters who will do anything from post names of posters to their mothers' obiturary.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:42 PM Author: Supple autistic indian lodge
"yes, i definitely will. look at it this way...if spending 20 bucks gets me a 10% chance of getting laid, then the value of sleeping with her is only $200.
that is way cheaper than a hooker. and she's young and clean and it'd be legal.
that is, if you really want to mathematically justify this."
I can't believe that the girl you wrote this about read it.
Think about that for a minute -- I feel for you Don, but this is fucking hysterical.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:50 PM Author: Big-titted corner
Don, if you are not elaborate schtick (and I suspect you are) I think it's time to take a step back and assess the cost/benefit of continuing to post so much on this board. Between your love life and law school apps you seem to be routinely and materially pwned.
Date: April 7th, 2006 3:53 PM Author: translucent temple
If he is schtick, he is the most brilliant schtick ever. He has posted for years and there have been outside sources like myspace and a hacked yahoo mail account that have extended the schtick beyond the board.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:00 PM Author: Big-titted corner
Maybe, maybe not. I know for a fact that (1) adcomms read this board and (2) there are several youngsters admitted to each top law school every year. It's at least a good possibility.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:05 PM Author: Pale laser beams
xoxo is full of jerks, but whoever did that definitely crossed the line. It's funny, yes, but I don't think such an action's benefits outweighed the possible costs including 1) don barzini posting less and more conservatively, and 2) the possible hilarity of him getting with the jewess and then someone pwning him by showing her the threads.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:09 PM Author: Pale laser beams
:(
You are an INSTITUTION on this board. I do not think you will be able to fully retire. At the very worst, I see you rising like an big, awkward, stingy phoenix out of the flames and getting a new moniker.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:17 PM Author: Frozen fanboi
I don't think an anonymous person forwarded the link to the picture. In order to do that, there would have to be a way to link facebook jpg's to accounts. There isn't.
More than likely it was a friend of hers, or maybe even an acquaintance. I don't think it's shitty that this person "ratted" Don out; if it were my friend, I wouldn't want them to go out with a person like don, either, especially if I were a rookie on XOXO and didn't know what passes for acceptable around here.
This was a pwnage of the highest order, in any case.
Yeah, facebook pic links contain her profile id. Someone less scrupulous than I will almost certainly soon post a link to her profile, her real name, and her email address. Then I imagine all hell will break lose.
Don, from someone who's said many stupid things and sucks with women, I can assure you that, if she's actually read the stuff you've said in threads about her, you should cease and desist immediately.
Some of the things Don wrote about her in previous threads:
"well this girl just had a nosejob. score!"
"yes, i definitely will. look at it this way...if spending 20 bucks gets me a 10% chance of getting laid, then the value of sleeping with her is only $200.
that is way cheaper than a hooker. and she's young and clean and it'd be legal. "
"funniest thing is i am not entirely kidding. i already thought about this and did the calculation."
"god i gotta try not to smoke before i see her so i dont stink. "
" i love her thickness"
" how about that thing her profile, listing dating but not friendship? does that strike you as desperation? i hope it is."
"oh i know her quite well,"
"yep and so is this chick. well perhaps not available and willing, not for me. but i'll never know unless i give it a shot. but she's young and juicy.
i can only hope she's 1/2 the freak monica is. i wanna do that cigar thing."
"she'd be fat if she gained much weight "
"i need to get the message across that i want a date (and ultimately pussy if all goes well)"
"plus she supposedly is very sad with low self esteem (body image issues or something i hear) so maybe she would like that. "
"i have dealt with girls just like her before, dated one. it is such a boon to find a low self esteem hottie. they are fucking gold."
"she knows me well. either she wants to fuck my big italian sausage or not."
"i hope she is a slut. easier for me."
"just sent the message. pray for me. with luck i shall pwn her hot yiddish cooter eventually"
" i am gonna ask my friend whom i hung out w/ friday (and who told me about this girl kinda being down in the dumps and possibly vulnerable) if she can hook me up, if this girl doesnt work out. "
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:54 PM Author: Avocado stead hairy legs
In Don's defense though, nothing he said was outrageous, and I took a number of those comments out of context. In his threads about her, he tried to stress that he was interested in a relationship with her, that her points of self-consciousness were objects of his delight, and that -- contrary to what posters implied by posting photos of cows and referring to her 'the beast' -- she was unbelievably attractive. I think though that while on guy terms everything Don said represents the most genuine and pure of objectives, women, being naive and emotional, won't appreciate learning how Don thought through this endeavor. Little will Jewess know that it's how most guys think.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:55 PM Author: Trip Amethyst Kitchen
You probably won't. In fact, I'd think it probably takes a UW-Madison facebook account to uncover a person's identity from a picture, but I'm not sure.
There are a LOT of lurkers on xoxo; more than we think. For every person who posts on this board, there are probably 20+ who know of it and read it but wouldn't dare to post. I've heard it come up in conversation before, though no one has once admitted (in real life) to posting on it.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:57 PM Author: translucent temple
Yeah, I think it's something along the lines of uwm.facebook.com/profile.php?id=14940020, but it's prompting me a login every time I play around with it and I can't find a caceh of it on google or anything.
Date: April 7th, 2006 4:58 PM Author: razzle sound barrier
if it was somebody that knows her in real life, it was definitely ok. if somebody from the board was writing shit like that about one of my friends i would definitely tell them, regardless of what sort of shit i would get on here. real life >>>>>>>>>>>> this place, obviously.
if it was somebody from the board, then that's more than questionable. funny as hell, but not cool.
*edit*
i would be willing to bet money, however, that one of her friends is a lurker... saw that, flipped their shit, and reported back to her.
Date: April 7th, 2006 5:07 PM Author: razzle sound barrier
nah, its definitely not cool. i mean... if don wants to spout off at the mouth comparing the financial advantage of taking a girl out vs hiring a prostitute, then its really none of our business, you know? but he should be willing to accept the consequences when some fucker rats him out. how could he honestly be surprised at that, given how much he's posted about her?
hopefully this *will* serve as a valuable lesson for him, though. women should be respected more than that if you want to get any pussssaaayyy.
Date: April 7th, 2006 5:14 PM Author: razzle sound barrier
After reading the collection of quotes from him above, I wouldn't fuck him.
There's a difference between having sex with someone (or lots of "someones") on *your* terms and agreeing to go out with someone who talks about you like don talked about her. Look at the quotes above. That's a lot of questionable shit for any self-respecting woman. Any time I was outright disrespected by a man, I'd walk. Not a big deal... Not to mention the fact that this girl probably doesnt *know* this board. She has no way to know about the extreme misogyny, racism, etc, that people exhibit here (whether it be real or joking)- all she knows is don was talking shit about her on the internet!
And yeah, this is coming from a chick who calls herself a superslut.
OMFG of all the damaging shit he wrote I never read this: " i am gonna ask my friend whom i hung out w/ friday (and who told me about this girl kinda being down in the dumps and possibly vulnerable) if she can hook me up, if this girl doesnt work out. "
Date: April 7th, 2006 5:00 PM Author: Indecent athletic conference
Two things:
1. What exactly happened between you and her? Phone call? Email? How did you find out that she knew about the thread?
2. Whoever did this WILL be brought to justice. I have already used my station to brand them as an America Hater. I already consider him/her convicted, we only need to find out who it is and deliver punishment.
Date: April 7th, 2006 5:10 PM Author: Stubborn Know-it-all Hell Really Tough Guy
don, didn't you say she was a facebook friend? It's pretty easy for anyone with a facebook account (me for instance) to figure out which friend she must be -- it's not like you haven't outed yourself multiple times on the board.
That said, J.'s idea to send her the link to that thread was a dick move -- if you can't open yourself up to your friends at xoxo, who can you open yourself up to? Once IRL ppl hear that shit, they get disgusted.
Date: April 7th, 2006 7:15 PM Author: Misanthropic Business Firm
i suppose if he retires we won't have to hear about how courts should give whites more lenient sentencing since they're more valuable to the economy. the whole racist economist shtick he's got going on is horseshit
Date: April 7th, 2006 8:41 PM Author: Indecent athletic conference
What is logically wrong with that claim? It would seem that from a utilitarian perspective, it makes sense to look the other way if a CEO who presided over a major company turnaround gets caught snorting coke. Society suffers a net loss from jailing him.
On the other hand, society gets a net gain from jailing some crackhead who robs people to support his habit. Since archetypes like those are correlated with race (whites are disproportionately powerful businessmen and blacks are disproportionately poor crackheads), Barzini's idea isn't as ridiculous on the face as you would make it out to be.
There is a balancing act between justice and utilitarianism and trying to obscure the complexity of the situation with cries of racism reeks of a lack of intellectual rigor.
Date: April 7th, 2006 10:00 PM Author: Indecent athletic conference
There isn't a justification for that specific comparison. However, we have to ask ourselves if it's really worth the time to look at the circumstances behind each individual when blanket categorizations based on race serve as a workable substitute. As we've seen from trying to implement diversity programs in universities, the costs imposed by thorough research are much higher than the benefits.
Date: April 7th, 2006 6:23 PM Author: indigo contagious national security agency
I wish I felt some sympathy for you, but I can't say I do. You wrote such ridiculous things about the girl (and even posted her picture) to a board full of fellow sociopaths. You play with fire and you're going to eventually get burned.
Date: July 24th, 2008 3:46 AM Author: Spectacular son of senegal faggotry
I like how someone noted how "Madison women are" on the thread. So true. Serious dudes in xoxo, you need to come up to Madison and hit up the bars/parties for a night. You're going to be shocked at both the attractiveness of the girls and also their highly pathetic nature. Friends from USC, Michigan, Northwestern, NYU, and Emory who have visited all remark about their unique -- slutty, no doubt -- nature.