Purdue should go undefeated
| Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Big-titted Very Tactful Property | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Big-titted Very Tactful Property | 10/04/04 | | shivering plum hall | 10/04/04 | | Cowardly curious selfie point | 10/04/04 | | Big-titted Very Tactful Property | 10/04/04 | | big stead | 10/04/04 | | Big-titted Very Tactful Property | 10/04/04 | | infuriating olive crackhouse queen of the night | 10/04/04 | | big stead | 10/04/04 | | shivering plum hall | 10/04/04 | | big stead | 10/04/04 | | Big-titted Very Tactful Property | 10/04/04 | | big stead | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/04/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/04/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/04/04 | | rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution | 10/04/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/04/04 | | rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution | 10/04/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/10/04 | | razzmatazz state headpube | 10/10/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/08/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | razzmatazz state headpube | 10/10/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | ruby church kitty cat | 10/10/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | azure ratface | 10/10/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | azure ratface | 10/10/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/10/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 10/10/04 | | rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution | 10/10/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 10/18/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/18/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/18/04 | | vigorous ceo forum | 10/18/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/18/04 | | vigorous ceo forum | 10/18/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 10/24/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 10/24/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 10/24/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 10/24/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 10/30/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 10/30/04 | | pontificating elastic band | 10/30/04 | | Slimy really tough guy | 10/30/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 10/31/04 | | ocher incel piazza | 10/31/04 | | charismatic field gunner | 10/31/04 | | rebellious theater stage | 10/31/04 | | charismatic field gunner | 10/31/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 10/31/04 | | Passionate Lay Main People | 09/25/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 11/01/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | indigo slippery clown brethren | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/01/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/01/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/01/04 | | exciting mustard stage community account | 11/06/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 11/06/04 | | exciting mustard stage community account | 11/06/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 11/06/04 | | exciting mustard stage community account | 11/06/04 | | Smoky exhilarant windowlicker | 11/06/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/07/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/08/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/22/04 | | Jet titillating dilemma | 11/22/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/22/04 | | Jet titillating dilemma | 11/27/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 11/29/04 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 11/27/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 11/28/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 11/29/04 | | ocher incel piazza | 12/01/04 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 12/06/04 | | ocher incel piazza | 12/06/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 12/15/04 | | ocher incel piazza | 12/15/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 12/15/04 | | Erotic Pistol | 12/15/04 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 12/15/04 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 12/29/04 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 12/31/04 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 01/04/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | avocado french lettuce stag film | 02/02/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/02/05 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 02/03/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/03/05 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 02/03/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/03/05 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 02/03/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/03/05 | | fishy bisexual deer antler | 02/03/05 | | Crusty wrinkle site | 02/03/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 02/02/05 | | ocher incel piazza | 02/14/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 03/06/05 | | violet indian lodge | 03/06/05 | | galvanic locus | 03/06/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 03/25/05 | | Chestnut Medicated Resort Police Squad | 03/25/05 | | ocher incel piazza | 04/20/05 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 05/09/05 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 06/04/05 | | coiffed international law enforcement agency juggernaut | 06/08/05 | | Stimulating Patrolman Tanning Salon | 08/28/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 09/03/05 | | rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution | 09/24/05 | | Rose marvelous menage | 09/25/05 | | Crystalline free-loading liquid oxygen fat ankles | 09/24/05 | | coiffed international law enforcement agency juggernaut | 10/01/05 | | abnormal sinister mother parlour | 10/02/05 | | Arousing Navy Box Office | 10/09/05 | | Racy painfully honest spot | 10/31/05 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 01/09/06 | | Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested | 09/30/06 | | Stimulating Patrolman Tanning Salon | 10/06/07 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:05 PM Author: Crusty wrinkle site
Remaining schedule:
Oct 9 at Penn State 4:30 PM
Oct 16 vs Wisconsin 5:30 PM
Oct 23 vs Michigan TBA
Oct 30 at Northwestern TBA
Nov 6 at Iowa TBA
Nov 13 vs Ohio State TBA
Nov 20 vs Indiana TBA
Their 3 toughest games (Wisconsin, Ohio State, and Michigan) are all at home. Ohio State was exposed against Northwestern. Michigan was exposed against Notre Dame. And Wisconsin should have lost at Arizona.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434530) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:11 PM Author: Erotic Pistol
51-0 vs. Syr
59-7 vs. Ball st.
38-30 @ Ill
41-16 @ ND
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434566) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:15 PM Author: shivering plum hall
"Is our QB still Drew Breeze?"
Ummm...no.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434587) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:28 PM Author: Big-titted Very Tactful Property
No, I don't have a TV here. Even if I did, I wouldn't watch football. I'd rather castigate people on this board.
So, WHO is the QB gid demmit?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434650) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:19 PM Author: Erotic Pistol
well, that was just against those teams, here is what I would say for the whole rest of the season:
@ PSU 85% chance
Wisc 65% chance
Mich 70% chance
@ NW 80% chance
@ Iowa 60% chance
OSU 65% chance
Indy 95% chance
that adds up to a 17% chance of going undefeated
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434600) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:24 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
I don't know how you determined that OSU has a better chance of beating Purdue than Michigan does.
OSU has not been impressive in a single game this year. They lost to Northfuckingwestern and barely beat Marshall. OSU will finish the season on the outside of the Top25 looking in.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434622) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:30 PM Author: Erotic Pistol
yeah, you're right. But I kind of discounted the chances that late in the season because its so far away. That takes the possiblity of injury, season gone awry, etc into account.
I agree that Mich is better than OSU though.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434658) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:30 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
It actually wasn't a crushing defeat. Both teams played very sloppy ball and turned the ball over. It was the first road game ever for a true frosh QB in ND stadium, of all places.
Michigan has dominated the last two games, while OSU has looked awful. And they didn't have "knack" to beat Northfuckingwestern.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434660) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:27 PM Author: rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution
OSU isn't good, but they have a knack for winning close, ugly games. Just look at that national title team.
I expect OSU to have 2 losses (NU and Purdue) when Michigan gets there in late November.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434644) |
 |
Date: October 4th, 2004 2:36 PM Author: rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution
Wisconsin has done no more to impress than OSU had going into this past week. They beat a very mediocre Arizona team 9-7. They only scored 16 against a mediocre Penn State team. Granted, they haven't lost yet, but that pathetic Arizona game was their only road game and Columbus is a bitch of a place to play. I feel pretty good picking OSU to win that one.
As for Iowa, I can't figure them out. Could go either way, but I'd bet on the Buckeyes again because of their defense. Iowa is turnover prone, as you saw first hand.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1434688) |
 |
Date: October 10th, 2004 1:20 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
You just say that because I'm high on UVA. Great LBs, balanced O, good qb - they are the best combo of O and D in the ACC.
Miami has phenomenal athletes on D, but, with Berlin, the passing game won't do much. UVA should be able to beat UM's running game. Groh has been huge at VA so far. FSU hasn't been impressive offensively with anybody at qb - and the running game has been erratic because of mediocre/erratic o-line play.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465466) |
Date: October 10th, 2004 12:44 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
Purdue is, probably, the 3rd or 4th best team in the big 10 now, depending on placement of Wisconsin (if you talk about ability to play, and not record). Northwestern, now, is probably just behind Wisconsin.
Minnesota and Michigan seem to be the two best teams in the conference. Minnesota's defense is suspect (having given up a lot of yards to Michigan and a few other teams), but, with the way that the running game usually works, it doesn't give the opposition the ball very much. Even against a highly effective NU offense, MN didn't allow many points. MN plays a disciplined game. Michigan could either be the best or second best team in the conference (the three turnovers are what kept it close yesterday). Michigan was beat by ND because Michigan had a lot of struggles converting in the red zone. With the progress of the MI qb, and with the weapons available, it's likely that UM will have the most potent all-around offense by the end of the season.
Purdue, by contrast, has struggled against mediocre teams like PSU. Purdue thumped ND, but, to keep in mind, Purdue is not likely to improve much offensively by the end of the season. PU's qb was the only starting qb in the b10 with 10+ games of starting experience. ND's weakness was the secondary. It doesn't take much to see that a veteran qb would be able to take advantage of that. Of course, ND was pass-happy on PU, which should make MI fans quite happy.
Wisconsin is the wild-card. The defense has been phenomenal, but mainly against 'running-teams' with weak running-games. We'll learn more when WI plays PU this week. If PU wins, then the PU/MI game is for the big10 title. Otherwise, it could be a split year between WI and MI. Purdue is too weak defensively (giving up tons of passing yards against PSU) to be considered the best.
Michigan has shown itself to be the only defense in the b10 capable of playing the run and pass. And, it seems, MI is the most effective offense with the most potential for the rest of the season (as long as the qb and rb improve).
Purdue will probably beat WI, but will lose to MI (my call). NU will give PU fits. But PU should be able to win the rest of its games (PU will beat tOSU, I think, this year).
I also call UVA to beat UM this year. UVA has been the most impressive team in the ACC this year, IMO.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465361) |
 |
Date: October 10th, 2004 1:38 PM Author: ruby church kitty cat
Purdue will go only as far as Kyle Orton will take them.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465539)
|
 |
Date: October 10th, 2004 1:43 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
Nope. The team bus. Orton isn't great. He's solid. He's put up excellent numbers against weak secondaries. Two picks against PSU don't mean much, but against better secondaries, PU will struggle. They will also struggle against teams that can move the ball effectively because those other teams will be able to move the ball, and, play better defense.
ND moved the ball easily, passing, against PU. PU also gave up over 200 yards on the ground to IL. MN and MI should have a good time racking up yards, if nothing else, against PU.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465561) |
 |
Date: October 10th, 2004 1:54 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
That was the game during which MI led 28-10 at the half and lost 32-31, or something like that, right?
Curry, as far as I know, will probably be third or fourth on the depth chart this week. He bit badly on a number of fakes, and MI has Mason and Hall to step up ahead of them. MI will also probably play D more like last year than in '00.
MI has a better D this year. If you watched the '00 game closely, you'd see that PU never really was stopped aside from a few bad calls in the first half. PU should have been tied. MI's D is better, and the O, relative to the PU D, is better this year. MI's O was more experienced in '00 with AT and the Oline and Henson, but PU's D was a lot better in '00, too.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465599) |
 |
Date: October 10th, 2004 2:00 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
It probably won't mean as much this year because of the overall wealth of talent in MI's DBs. If MI sits in a nickel D, they could play Shazor, Jackson, Mundy, Hall, and Mason without breaking a sweat. That's also assuming that MI wouldn't just blitz a lot using Curry or something - more like last year.
Curry probably got his last real shot yesterday, and he seemed to blow it.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1465620) |
Date: October 10th, 2004 8:13 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
I find it a little bit ridiculous that Purdue has gone from number 15 to number 5 in the past two weeks, considering that their only two conference wins have been close, and have come against teams with a combined 0-6 record in the Big 10, and 4-8 overall.
Oh well, the cream will rise to the top.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1467198) |
Date: October 18th, 2004 12:51 PM Author: Crusty wrinkle site
Okay, so clearly I was wrong about Purdue, but now the question becomes, "Will Wisconsin lose before the bowls?"
Oct 23 vs Northwestern
Nov 6 vs Minnesota
Nov 13 at Michigan State
Nov 20 at Iowa
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1507206)
|
 |
Date: October 18th, 2004 4:40 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
Well, MSU will probably not beat Wisconsin. MN has huge problems following losses to Michigan (12 years in a row, MN has lost after losing to MI). MSU, similarly, plays poorly after playing MI - win or lose.
MN is a bit unpredictable. Of course, WI has a great D-line, so I'd take WI. NWU could make it interesting if they manage to spread teh field with lots of short passing routes, but Purdue didn't find much success with that until they injured WI's D-line.
Iowa would be the favorite to do it. Wisconsin looks like tOSU a few years ago. Good defense due to a great D-line, but they haven't been world-beaters. Of course, tOSU needed a huge play against PU to win.. and WI just got a huge play (fumble).. it could happen that WI goes undefeated, but I don't like it on the grounds that I don't think that WI has played like a world-beating team.
I would like WI against Oklahoma and Auburn, but the jury is out on SC.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1508312) |
Date: October 18th, 2004 4:44 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
Interesting. In my call, I said that PU would beat WI, but I was fairly good in my assessment of the teams - aside from the post MI letdown from MN.
So far, I'd say:
WI
MI
MSU/PU/Iowa
MN
NWU
tOSU/PSU
ILL
IN
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1508335) |
 |
Date: October 18th, 2004 4:51 PM Author: vigorous ceo forum
WI
PU
UM
MN
MSU/Iowa/NU/OSU/PSU -- This group is still too tough to decipher
IL/IN
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1508367) |
Date: October 24th, 2004 8:59 PM Author: indigo slippery clown brethren
hahahaha
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1541964) |
Date: October 24th, 2004 9:03 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
the big 10 sucks
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1541983) |
Date: October 30th, 2004 3:32 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
Bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1572103) |
 |
Date: October 30th, 2004 4:26 PM Author: Slimy really tough guy
Haha, nice bump. What a fraudulent TTT that team turned out to be.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1572325)
|
 |
Date: October 31st, 2004 2:45 AM Author: charismatic field gunner
A&M lost to Baylor. The showdown with OU means nothing now.
How the fuck did you guys lose to a team you beat 73-10 the previous year?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1574530) |
Date: October 31st, 2004 2:36 AM Author: rebellious theater stage
still got bitch-slapped by wisconsin!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1574514) |
Date: October 31st, 2004 2:49 AM Author: charismatic field gunner
"Ohio State was exposed against Northwestern. Michigan was exposed against Notre Dame. And Wisconsin should have lost at Arizona."
Based on what Purdue has done the past three weeks, I would confidently venture that they are the ones that got exposed.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1574539)
|
 |
Date: October 31st, 2004 12:27 PM Author: indigo slippery clown brethren
"Michigan was exposed against Notre Dame."
Yeah, "exposed" as a team whose 2nd and 3rd best players were true freshmen with no experience at that point. The Michigan team today is a completely different beast than it was in September, and would absolutely dismantle Notre Dame.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1575170) |
Date: November 1st, 2004 12:45 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1579633) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:28 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
They should come up with a system where you get penalized for an asskicking at least.
Fucking ASU #6.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581256) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:45 PM Author: indigo slippery clown brethren
Said you, in response to someone else (i.e. not me) trying to tell you for the first time that margin of victory didn't mean "anything" to the computers:
"It doesn't mean everything, but it certainly means something, which is why the Utes are currently doing so well in the computer rankings."
(http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=99623#1555930)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581398) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:56 PM Author: indigo slippery clown brethren
Uh, I don't believe I've ever heard anyone refer to any such thing as the "overall BCS *computer* rankings" before.
If you can find me one reference in ESPN or SI or some other respected source where the phrase "computer rankings" is used to refer to the overall rankings, I might believe you.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581452) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 6:02 PM Author: Crusty wrinkle site
Not that I need to defend myself, but a quick google search comes up with plenty of hits for BCS Computer Rankings, referring to the over all rankings. Here's the 1st one that came up on my search:
www.sciencenews.org/articles/20040904/mathtrek.asp
"In the absence of sufficient detail to reproduce the official BCS computer rankings, they add, this simple random walker ranking scheme can be useful for analyzing the effects of possible changes in the BCS formula."
Frankly, looking back at the previous thread, I'm shocked at how badly you misread my posts. I'm talking about it not being all or nothing and how excluding margin of victory is being simplistic. Clearly, the point of this can't be that there is an explicit calculation in the individual computer rankings. And just as clearly, I'm talking about an indirect impact on the polls.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581488) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:29 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
Date: October 10th, 2004 8:13 PM
Author: inin2004
I find it a little bit ridiculous that Purdue has gone from number 15 to number 5 in the past two weeks, considering that their only two conference wins have been close, and have come against teams with a combined 0-6 record in the Big 10, and 4-8 overall.
Oh well, the cream will rise to the top.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581267)
|
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:31 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
When compared to [Purdue], yes.
I didn't say the cream will rise to the top by week 8, I said it will rise to the top.
Michigan will win the Big 10.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581289) |
 |
Date: November 1st, 2004 5:35 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
It was something. Made all the sweeter by the fact that the MSU fans seated nearby were royal assholes.
Michigan will be a fun team to watch for the next couple of years.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1581319) |
Date: November 6th, 2004 7:03 PM Author: exciting mustard stage community account
bump!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1610498) |
 |
Date: November 6th, 2004 7:14 PM Author: Smoky exhilarant windowlicker
They lack the talent, by and large. The teams don't have depth. The scheme reminds me of Barnett's NWU scheme in the mid 90s - spreading out the opp. defense. They do a lot with a little, but expecting them to do more than that is silly.
It's tough on the B10 teams when you have tOSU and MI drinking up all the real talent from the area.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1610558) |
Date: November 8th, 2004 8:49 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1622017) |
Date: November 22nd, 2004 1:07 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1688879) |
Date: November 22nd, 2004 1:07 PM Author: Jet titillating dilemma
truly awesome.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1688880) |
 |
Date: November 27th, 2004 5:15 PM Author: Jet titillating dilemma
two questions:
(1) did i or did i not go a perfect 6-0 against the spread the only two weeks i offered my nfl games on the board?
(2) did you or did you not decline the challenge when i suggested you try to do the same?
HTH
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1708316) |
Date: November 27th, 2004 5:05 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
I haven't been following college football lately.
Did Purdue end up undefeated?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1708287) |
Date: November 29th, 2004 9:49 AM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1715122) |
Date: December 1st, 2004 4:43 PM Author: ocher incel piazza
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1726467) |
Date: December 6th, 2004 7:48 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
Purdue and Cal in the Rose Bowl, Baby!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1751876) |
Date: December 15th, 2004 11:55 AM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
nobody - still the biggest shithead around.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1795164) |
Date: December 29th, 2004 7:54 PM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
Douchebag.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1855522) |
Date: December 31st, 2004 6:19 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
12-0!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1864259) |
Date: January 4th, 2005 4:25 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
still awesome
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#1878023) |
Date: February 2nd, 2005 10:39 AM Author: avocado french lettuce stag film
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2047445) |
 |
Date: February 2nd, 2005 11:02 AM Author: avocado french lettuce stag film
16-12(7-10).
Um, no.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2047557) |
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2005 10:49 AM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
I don't believe they use postseason tournament records when considering conference record.
Anyway, do you think VaTech will make the tournament? Neither do I. And I can tell you right now, if MD loses one of its two upcoming games against VT, MD will not be invited to the Big Dance.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2054679) |
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2005 10:51 AM Author: Crusty wrinkle site
"I don't believe they use postseason tournament records when considering conference record."
They don't. But the point is that FSU was 6-10 and then lost their 1st round game in the ACC's and got in, and the same went for a 7-9 UVA team another year.
"Anyway, do you think VaTech will make the tournament?"
I don't think that they will...
"And I can tell you right now, if MD loses one of its two upcoming games against VT, MD will not be invited to the Big Dance."
I could easily see them losing 1 and still getting in. Heck, they were 4-8 or 4-9 at one point in the ACC last year and then went on a nice run...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2054690)
|
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2005 10:56 AM Author: fishy bisexual deer antler
A) That Florida State team was the only team since 1996 that made the tournament with a conference record that bad.
B) Only 6 times between 1996 and 2004 did a team even one game below .500 in conference play get invited.
C) Only one time (the aforementioned FSU team) has a team been invited to the tournament when a team with a better record in-conference in the same conference was not. If MD loses to VT, it will almost certainly have a worse conference record than VT.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2054706) |
 |
Date: February 3rd, 2005 11:00 AM Author: Crusty wrinkle site
"A) That Florida State team was the only team since 1996 that made the tournament with a conference record that bad."
True, but I've been talking about MD at 7-9, not 6-10...
"B) Only 6 times between 1996 and 2004 did a team even one game below .500 in conference play get invited."
As I said before, when an ACC team has been 7-9 when the ACC has been the top rated conference, that team has always made the NCAAs...
"C) Only one time (the aforementioned FSU team) has a team been invited to the tournament when a team with a better record in-conference record in the same conference was not. If MD loses to VT, it will almost certainly have a worse conference record than VT."
MD could easily lose 1 to VT, and VT could still go 7-9. Just as easily, however, VT could go 9-7 or 10-6 and make the NCAAs. Besides, this situation is similar to the FSU one in that the team likely to be passed over, was relatively TTT in OOC play...
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2054722) |
Date: February 14th, 2005 12:55 AM Author: ocher incel piazza
i love this thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2126339) |
Date: March 6th, 2005 3:25 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2268974) |
Date: March 6th, 2005 3:29 PM Author: violet indian lodge
I won $500 betting on MI against Purdue. What idiot made purdue a favorite in that game?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2268996) |
Date: March 6th, 2005 6:29 PM Author: galvanic locus
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2270119) |
Date: March 25th, 2005 9:37 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2408197) |
Date: April 20th, 2005 1:14 AM Author: ocher incel piazza
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2596681) |
Date: May 9th, 2005 10:00 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2741633) |
Date: June 4th, 2005 11:09 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2932680) |
Date: June 8th, 2005 12:52 AM Author: coiffed international law enforcement agency juggernaut
In honor of the Nebraska thread
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#2957221) |
Date: August 28th, 2005 5:50 PM Author: Stimulating Patrolman Tanning Salon
bump
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3696022) |
Date: September 3rd, 2005 11:48 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3741237) |
Date: September 24th, 2005 3:57 PM Author: rusted hyperventilating skinny woman institution
Second Annual DING!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3894837) |
Date: September 24th, 2005 4:03 PM Author: Crystalline free-loading liquid oxygen fat ankles
hth
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3894891) |
Date: October 1st, 2005 11:48 PM Author: coiffed international law enforcement agency juggernaut
Yup.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3951190) |
Date: October 2nd, 2005 1:13 PM Author: abnormal sinister mother parlour
No doubt.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#3953523) |
Date: October 9th, 2005 4:16 PM Author: Arousing Navy Box Office
!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#4007663) |
Date: October 31st, 2005 5:22 PM Author: Racy painfully honest spot
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#4180792) |
Date: January 9th, 2006 1:13 AM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#4769946) |
Date: September 30th, 2006 3:29 PM Author: Yellow excitant school cafeteria idea he suggested
BUMP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#6704077) |
Date: October 6th, 2007 9:47 PM Author: Stimulating Patrolman Tanning Salon
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=89981&forum_id=2#8736248) |
|
|