The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
AutoAdmit Forum @ HLS w/ Mike Fertik, CEO of Rep. Defenders!
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 2nd, 2007 3:56 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/clinicalwiki/Internet_Speech_Panel_at_HLS
Panelists:
Professor Charles Nesson, Harvard Law School
Professor Mark Tushnet, Harvard Law School
Professor John Palfrey, Harvard Law School
Dina Lassow, National Women's Law Center
Robert Trestan, Anti-Defamation League
Wendy Kaminer
Michael Fertik, CEO of Repuation Defenders
When: Thursday, April 5th, at 7:00pm
Where: Langdell North |
 |
Date: April 2nd, 2007 3:59 PM Author: Lime school Someone ask Michael Fertik whether it's true that he was considered one of the most annoying students at HLS. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7860674) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:01 PM Author: green wild hell Someone with free time: consider editing this article in annoying/vulgar ways. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7860927) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:39 PM Author: Provocative topaz senate yeah, either that or edit it to make sense:
"The site draws an estimated 100,000 readers on a regular basis..."
yay Harvurdd |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:53 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin You probably need to be with the Berkman Center to edit it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861167) |
|
Date: April 15th, 2007 6:12 AM Author: Supple nowag deer antler Subject: Compilation of Negative Links About R.D. and Michael Fertik Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=611106&mc=2&forum_id=2 Michael Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=612051&mc=19&forum_id=2 Mike Fertik http://snarkybastards.com/index.php/category/the-law-is-an-ass-an-idiot/page/2/ ReputationDefender http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/Michael_Fertik http://positiveliberty.com/category/the-bureau/page/2/ Michael Fertik Reputation Defender Mike Fertik http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYEHkXJmsO0 Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://www.hlrecord.org/news/2005/03/17/Etc/Fenno-896966.shtml Michael Fertik Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://authorskeptics.blogspot.com/2004/11/professor-tribe-new-harvard-law-record.html Mike Fertik Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://forum.mamboserver.com/showthread.php?t=62768&page=2 Michael Fertik ReputationDefender ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=612051&mc=19&forum_id=2 Mike Fertik ReputationDefender http://bamber.blogspot.com/2007_01_01_archive.html Mike Fertik Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/01/irony-at-cada-vez.html Michael Fertik Mike Fertik http://www.metafilter.com/57676/Just-this-site-alone-would-make-them-millionaires http://media.www.hlrecord.org/media/storage/paper609/news/2004/11/04/Etc/Fenno-795548-ReputationDefender page3.shtml Mike Fertik Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com ReputationDefender Michael Fertik http://snarkybastards.com/index.php/2007/01/25/irony-deficient-no-more/ Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=612268&mc=12&forum_id=2 Michael Fertik ReputationDefender http://positiveliberty.com/2007/01/ Mike Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&mc=42&forum_id=2 ReputationDefender http://bamber.blogspot.com/2007/01/death-of-online-gossip.html Mike Fertik ReputationDefender Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&mc=42&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&mc=127&forum_id=2 http://snarkybastards.com/index.php/2007/01/ Michael Fertik ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606557&mc=23&forum_id=2 ReputationDefender Reputation Defender http://snarkybastards.com/index.php/category/excruciatingly-correct-behavior/page/3/ Michael Fertik ReputationDefender Reputation Defender http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=611106&mc=2&forum_id=2 Mike Fertik http://bamber.blogspot.com/2007/01/i-know-you-got-bad-reputation.html ReputationDefender http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=606557&mc=23&forum_id=2 Michael Fertik Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com Reputation Defender ReputationDefender http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/01/irony-at-cada-vez.html Mike Fertik Reputation Defender http://onlinereputation.googlepages.com/charityefforts ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=608857&mc=26&forum_id=2 ReputationDefender http://www.hlrecord.org/news/2005/03/17/Etc/Fenno-896966.shtml Michael Fertik http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/ Mike Fertik Michael Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=612268&mc=12&forum_id=2 Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com Mike Fertik ReputationDefender http://www.hlrecord.org/news/2004/11/04/Etc/Fenno-795548-page4.shtml Reputation Defender Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=608857&mc=26&forum_id=2 Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com http://onlinereputation.googlepages.com/letter http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551 http://www.positiveliberty.com/2007/03/reputation-defender-continued.html Mike Fertik ReputationDefender http://consumerist.com/consumer/reputation-defender/ Michael Fertik http://www.autoadmit.com/challenge.to.reputation.defender.html Mike Fertik Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com ReputationDefender http://consumerist.com/consumer/evil/ronnie-segev--reputationdefender-can-eat-a-dick-227969.php Michael Fertik http://blog.wired.com/monkeybites/2006/10/need_someone_to.html Mike Fertik http://lifehacker.com/commenter/nschneble/ Michael Fertik ReputationDefender http://tags.consumerist.com/consumer/censorship/?refId=150996&prevPage=true ReputationDefender http://michealfertik.blogspot.com/ Michael Fertik ReputationDefender Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591603&mc=18&forum_id=2 Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://lifehacker.com/commenter/slapshot24/?showtab=all Mike Fertik ReputationDefender http://www.feedster.com/search/type/rss/letter Michael Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&mc=127&forum_id=2Reputation Defender http://xoxoreader.blogspot.com/2007/03/reputationdefender-heide-iravani-wants.html ReputationDefender http://forum.mamboserver.com/showthread.php?t=62768&page=2 Michael Fertik http://www.techbasedmarketing.com/blog/04-10-2007/the-best-reputation-defender-is/ ReputationDefender http://feministlawprofs.law.sc.edu/?cat=32 Mike Fertik Michael Fertik http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591603&mc=18&forum_id=2 http://www.familytimes.com/node/view/723 http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551 Michael Fertik http://michealfertik.blogspot.com/ Reputation Defender Michael Fertik http://www.repdefender.ytmnd.com Reputation Defender http://michaelfertik.blogspirit.com/atom.xml http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591603&mc=18&forum_id=2 http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=611106 ReputationDefender http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=612051 http://onlinereputation.googlepages.com/casestudy3
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:21 PM Author: electric messiness who will defend us? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861009) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:24 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin rachmiel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861027) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:26 PM Author: trip space mexican bullshit. is he really going to show up? it might be worth the trip if so. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861037) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:40 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Of course he is.
He would have shown up to Yale if he had been invited. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:44 PM Author: electric messiness he was invited to show up, but not speak "officially"?
god I would fucking pay to see that. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:47 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin He's likely not on there because they haven't worked out the logistics since he's been on vacation for a week. But he has been invited and he did accept. I was invited too but couldn't go due to a scheduling conflict. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861138) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:21 AM Author: big grizzly point "a scheduling conflict" = "the fact that I didn't want to get CAREERPWN3D" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864674) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:24 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin a scheduling conflict = I'm in a class where if I don't attend I lose 4 points off my final grade. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864681) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:25 AM Author: big grizzly point Tomato, Tomahto. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864684) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:42 AM Author: Razzle institution hominid What class is that? I definitely want to avoid that class/professor... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864930) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:44 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Negotiation & Persuasion, the most popular and hardest to get into class at Penn Law. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864936) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 11:05 AM Author: Galvanic menage nibblets prestigious (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7865020) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:46 PM Author: Yapping skinny woman if only there were some way to convince him to change his mind (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868584) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:48 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Been there, done that. He doesn't budge on this stuff, though he spent like 30 minutes of one class listening to arguments from people. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868603) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:48 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Ceo Keepsake Machete (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868604) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:41 PM Author: Embarrassed to the bone nudist locale dopamine nice (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861110) |
|
Date: April 24th, 2007 8:32 PM Author: marvelous flushed alpha location never forget
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=592614&mc=52&forum_id=2
http://www.encyclopediadramatica.com/index.php/AutoAdmit
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=599817&mc=12&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=592396&mc=58&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=290757&mc=17&forum_id=2
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/220037/autoadmit_threat_shuts_down_hastings.html
http://anonymouslawyer.blogspot.com/2007/03/reader-sent-me-link-to-washington-post.html
http://onlinereputation.googlepages.com/charityefforts
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=197266&mc=105&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=614676&mc=10&forum_id=2
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=592855&mc=5&forum_id=2
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=331077
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=617425&mc=12&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591664&mc=9&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=54&forum_id=2
http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&forum_id=2&PHPSESSID=d3275a68320df53fb45fe1e232cb3b53
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=591875&mc=55&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617176&mc=12&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=1&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=15&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=613270&mc=12&forum_id=2
http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=617793&mc=34&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:43 PM Author: Copper vibrant cruise ship regret Is he accepting donations to acquire a golden star? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861120) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:32 PM Author: green wild hell He has no legal training, right? He is guaranteed to get thoroughly OWNed by this panel.
This should be hilarious. Make sure this gets uTubed. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:36 PM Author: bisexual narrow-minded property "He has no legal training, right? He is guaranteed to get thoroughly OWNed by this panel."
This is right. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:01 PM Author: alcoholic field Not necessarily. He needs to keep the focus tight. What is the discussion about? Free speech on the internet. What about...? I would rather we keep it to the facts than to speculate about various hypotheticals. What about...? Repeat.
Rachmiel can do just fine because he has a lot of things in his favor. If he focuses on those things and doesn't let it devolve into a bunch of bullshit, he can win. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 1:10 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin I find it funny how people underestimate rachmiel. The guy knows how to think on his feet and handle difficult situations (he's done it for so many years on a daily basis at his job), and if given the choice I'd rather he be on a panel like that than me because I think he'd do a better job. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7865640) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:02 PM Author: alcoholic field Good point. I was thinking about how I would approach it, but rachmiel may not need to keep the focus tight to do well. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:05 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Thing is, he's pretty good at keeping the focus tight. You should have heard him on the phone with RD. Honestly, him outmaneuvering Fertik on that conference call is likely why Fertik doesn't want to debate him in public. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868322) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:29 PM Author: Copper vibrant cruise ship regret What a diverse panel of opinions. I expect bitter debate and engaging dialog. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861052) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:51 PM Author: saffron concupiscible national This panel seems way too large. 8 people, once you throw in Rachmiel, is going to be extremely unwieldy.
Not to mention that things are looking pretty one-sided (based on my, admittedly, uninformed impressions of where people will line up which may be completely wrong). |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:54 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Agreed on it being too large. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861171) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:54 PM Author: sepia floppy crackhouse rigor 8 lawyers and professors vs an insurance salesman. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861173) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:55 PM Author: Copper vibrant cruise ship regret I wonder how many are Jews. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861180) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 5:55 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin They're not all on the same side. Read their bios. It's actually a pretty even panel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861182) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:15 PM Author: Passionate garnet toilet seat I resent the implication that Michael Fertik is a lawyer. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861284) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:47 PM Author: irradiated irate tattoo heaven CH should be invited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861442) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:52 PM Author: awkward resort ladyboy Who's going to be on Rach's team?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861461) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:54 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861468) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:56 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Unfortunately I may have jumped the gun on rachmiel being there. Based on an email I just received, it looks like he may have been uninvited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861487) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 6:59 PM Author: electric messiness explain! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861504) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:02 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin From the email I just received:
"I understand that Jarrett Cohen was interested in participating, however, I think his presence on the panel will cause the discussion to be focused on AutoAdmit. We have conceived of this panel as being a more broad discussion and I don’t want it to turn into personal attacks." |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:04 PM Author: soul-stirring turdskin international law enforcement agency from fertik or some hls crony? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861528) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:00 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant rach told me last week (AIM) that fertik was refusing to show up if rach was invited.
looks like HLS isnt as balanced as they should've been.
i take back what i said about them handling this in an intelligent way/better than YLS |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:01 PM Author: awkward resort ladyboy Why would they rather have Fertik show up over Rachmiel? That's completely retarded. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861515) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:04 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant they dont want to hear the other side. its pretty obvious.
all these articles just put words in peoples' mouths. they lend a poor impression. they create indefensible situations and argue against strawmen.
verdict: pathetic waste of time. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:52 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin To be fair, they are offering to have him (and me) come speak on a different date. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861835) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:17 PM Author: honey-headed razzle-dazzle hall (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7881239) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:01 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Yeah, that's true -- when Fertik found out rach was invited, he said he wasn't going to attend if rach came. HLS responded by saying rach was not going to be uninvited.
Guess that's changed now, three days before the panel. |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:06 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant at this point, fertik is going to get a free pass. HLS should be ashamed of itself for allowing itself to be used in this way, by a person providing a poor, ineffective service.
now you can expect some pathetic advertisement or press releases re: fertik to speak @ HLS. no, no, they'll say "fertik to *lecture* at HLS". |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:47 PM Author: stirring translucent bawdyhouse This information should be added to the challenge to reputation defender. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861802) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:26 AM Author: violet friendly grandma wow, hls is lame (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864603) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:34 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Yeah, I'm not very pleased right now. I don't know what's more offensive,
-- being disinvited three days before a conference after travel arrangements have likely been made (and after being told HLS wasn't going to give in to Fertik's hissy fit),
-- the implication that rachmiel is somehow too stupid or unqualified to talk about anonymous internet speech in a broader context than this board, or
-- the Dean of Students office having such a low respect for HLS students that they think they would devolve to personal attacks if rachmiel is present.
I guess their offer to have Jarret and I speak at different events in the future mitigates things, but a lot of the good feelings I had for HLS throughout this process have dissipated now, which I think is very unfortunate since until this I've completely agreed on how they've handled everything. |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:19 PM Author: honey-headed razzle-dazzle hall . (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7881251) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:03 PM Author: soul-stirring turdskin international law enforcement agency fertik is a scoundrel. yes, i'm going to use that word. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861525) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:05 PM Author: Dashing Magenta Den He's such a scumbag! How can people not recognize that?
He takes people's money and then completely trashes their reputation on the Internet. I'm going to set up an opposing service, and for $5 I'll tell people "keep being a good person, keep doing good work, and ignore the shitheads talking about you on the Internet. You'll be fine." |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:07 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant hey reputation defender, when you read this thread, check this out:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYEHkXJmsO0&mode=related&search= |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 7:12 PM Author: beta piazza selfie Law schools are generally not interested in hearing from anyone who departs from their orthodoxy. See, e.g., the Solomon Amendment. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7861573) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:04 PM Author: alcoholic field a fine example. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862933) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:06 PM Author: Copper vibrant cruise ship regret Censorship is a liberal tenet now? Pathetic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862942) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 10:48 PM Author: Laughsome cheese-eating station party of the first part I don't post on here, mostly I just read. But I might go on Thursday. If you all have questions you'd like me to ask Fertick or others, let me know. Obviously I won't ask anything incendiary or offensive. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862829) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 10:50 PM Author: soul-stirring turdskin international law enforcement agency ask him why he's been so unwilling to cooperate with rachmiel - the very person who can make his wildest dream come true (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862838) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 10:55 PM Author: Flesh generalized bond ask why people don't have better things to do with their time and doesn't this distract attention away from actual gender issues. ask whether there's a difference b/w crap online that hurts your feelings and someone sending you threatening letters or hiding in your bushes with piano wire. after they get waffle for a couple seconds, cut in with "Yeah. I thought so." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862878) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:47 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Ceo Keepsake Machete 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868594) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:07 PM Author: alcoholic field the obvious question...'why did you condition your attendance on rachmiel's absence?' (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862952) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:09 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor i will ask this (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862964) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:17 AM Author: territorial stead This must be asked. If someone else asks first, ask a follow up. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864814) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:48 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Ceo Keepsake Machete 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868600) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:08 PM Author: Bat-shit-crazy Chrome Lay I agree with the above. Ask Fertik why he refused to attend the panel unless Jarret Cohen's invitation was rescinded. If he denies this, ask if he would be willing to be present at a future panel with Jarret Cohen and Anthony Ciolli, since HLS has invited them already. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862961) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:27 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin To clarify, he refused to attend if either me or rachmiel were present. Both me and rachmiel had been invited, but I wasn't able to attend due to a conflict. rachmiel had accepted the invitation though, only to have his offer rescinded yesterday afternoon after Fertik threw his hissy fit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864604) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:02 PM Author: smoky temple If they don't want to focus on autoadmit.com, what the hell else are they going to talk about? This site is one of a kind, and so is the shit-bombing it causes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7862921) |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:08 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant some mom in peoria was concerned that 6 ppl her daughter may not even know (oh noes!!) downloaded her pic off of myspace!!!
why that should be illegal, what lawyers can do to change the law, and what Fertik's company can do if you keep giving them press!!
they can clean up the internet, $30 per page!! |
|
Date: April 2nd, 2007 11:16 PM Author: Embarrassed to the bone nudist locale dopamine link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7863013) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:27 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin http://kutv.com/seenon/local_story_087192353.html (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864605) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:37 AM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant basically, this is pathetic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864615) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:53 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin But a picture from her publicly accessible webshots album was downloaded SIX times--BY PEOPLE SHE DOESN'T KNOW! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864632) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:55 AM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant you and rach should actually be @ the HLS thing bc you're victims too. of course, youre victims of the MSM moreso than the interwebs. the MSM lends the imprimitur (in many people's eyes) of accuracy to the accusations against you.
but you guys have a Y chrom., so its no biggie. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:56 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin I can't go, I have a conflict that I can't reschedule (hence why I declined to be on that panel).
I wonder how Fertik would react if rachmiel showed up, sat in the audience, and asked him why Fertik was too scared to be on a panel with him. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:02 AM Author: Bat-shit-crazy Chrome Lay That's actually a very good idea. Will rach do it? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864643) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:50 PM Author: Fantasy-prone Ceo Keepsake Machete 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868613) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:20 AM Author: nighttime school cafeteria (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864594) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:54 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Update: it seems Ann Althouse has also been uninvited from the HLS internet speech panel. So, at least rachmiel is in good company. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864633) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 8:56 AM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant HLS is shaking in their boots at thought of an NYU grad pwning their panel. NYU #4 and gunning for H next... haha (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864635) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:05 AM Author: Lime school How do you know this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864644) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:07 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Her name was removed from the list of panelists on the wiki and I inquired further about what happened. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864649) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:08 AM Author: Lime school Lame on the part of the organizers. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864651) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:12 AM Author: Bat-shit-crazy Chrome Lay Can anybody edit this wiki? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864660) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:14 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin No idea. Probably not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864663) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:17 AM Author: nighttime school cafeteria This is absurd. The Berkman center usually strikes me as pretty cool, why are they caving to Fertik like this? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864666) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:17 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin I don't think it's the Berkman Center as much as the Dean of Students office. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864668) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:19 AM Author: nighttime school cafeteria Really? Didn't think Cosgrove had veto power over panelists- there are so damn many here that such an arrangement would surprise me. But maybe she's paying attention to this one since it's sort of a hot topic. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864670) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:26 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin No clue if it was Cosgrove's decision or not (my experience with her has been nothing but positive), but the email came from someone in that office.
In any case, they're still offering to have rachmiel speak at a different event, so I at least give them credit for that. My only fear is that Fertik is going to get up there, lie, and no one will call him out on it because they're unfamiliar with the facts. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:29 AM Author: Laughsome cheese-eating station party of the first part I'm going to try, but this is looking less and less like a place where they'll be receptive to views other than the Fertik/media narrative. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864696) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:32 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Hey, ultimately the audience has the power. The panel can still serve its purpose if people ask Fertik and the other panelists the hard questions and call him out if he lies or says something dumb.
Plus it looks like there may be another event this month, so hopefully people will go to that. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:49 AM Author: Laughsome cheese-eating station party of the first part If you were there, what are the main points you would make? Besides asking Fertik why he conditioned his attendance on you and Rach's absence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864736) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 4:46 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Jarret Cohen offered to remove all the threads if Reputation Defender just apologizes. Why not just apologize and get the threads taken down?
AutoAdmit was already in the process of doing everything you wanted--why antagonize them?
Why contact law deans before contacting AutoAdmit?
Why did you talk to the Washington Post and ABC News before talking to AutoAdmit?
Do you realize that because of you the number of AutoAdmit-related results in one of your client's Google search increased from just one to seven in the top 10 alone?
Jarret Cohen contacted one of your clients several weeks ago with the intention of finding out which threads to remove, but your client refused to talk to him because she was "too tired." How do you expect this situation to resolve itself without direct communication?
Why won't you tell AutoAdmit which threads you want removed?
You've thrown everything you can at AutoAdmit yet the threads are not only still up, but there are a lot more of them. Don't you think this warrants reexamining your strategy?
So far, all the known clients of Reputation Defender, such as Ronnie Segev and Christine Parascandola not only still have true, publically available information about them available on the internet, but have also received significant criticism from blogs and other outlets for hiring Reputation Defender. Don't you think your company's business model is inherently unsustainable?
Why are you attacking AutoAdmit instead of Google when AutoAdmit is a passive actor while Google actively indexes webpages? Isn't Google more blameworthy, or at least just as blameworthy? Aren't you only targeting AutoAdmit because you're too scared to take on Google? |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 4:50 PM Author: appetizing fighting state Here's another question: If RD really works, why is it that when I search your name on google "Michael Fertik is a sleazy douchebag" comes up on the first page? |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 4:52 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant excellent questions by both of you.
someone should also name-drop the site http://onlinereputation.googlepages.com
tyia |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 4:57 PM Author: doobsian trailer park wagecucks is this you?
http://forum.mamboserver.com/showthread.php?t=62768&page=2 |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:19 AM Author: flirting puppy elastic band Rach should bring George Galloway to the debate. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864671) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:36 AM Author: Passionate garnet toilet seat This thread makes me wonder why really smart people are so impossibly stupid when only slightly less smart people are not. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7864710) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:50 AM Author: Avocado chapel roommate Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:36 AM Author: Bodhi Tree Miracle
This thread makes me wonder why really smart people are so impossibly stupid when only slightly less smart people are not. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:11 AM Author: Passionate garnet toilet seat Does this kind of shit happen at Emory or Iowa?
It doesn't happen at my TTT. |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 7:00 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant people at your TTT don't realize they go to a TTT.
that might be sadder.
DO THE WOOSTLE!!! |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 1:06 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7865620) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 6:51 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7867577) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:39 PM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant because of the whole summers thing, i really doubt any harvard prof is going to stand up to the campus left and stand against censorship in this situation... they should've gotten other law profs--BC, BU, etc. or at least gotten profs who will speak out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868548) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:42 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin They had Ann Althouse, but they uninvited her three days before the panel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868563) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 9:52 PM Author: Yapping skinny woman that fertik guy is an excellent marketer, he's going to make a fortune off heide iravani, the harvard name, and far left libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868623) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:43 PM Author: nighttime school cafeteria Issues to be discussed:
"The panel will focus on the following questions:
- What are the legal issues relating to anonymous speech on the Internet? - Are there special consequences of Internet speech, given the permanent and wide- reaching nature of the medium? - Is this libelous speech? Is it sexual harassment? - What First Amendment protections apply to those posting on an Internet site? - Is there a need for an anonymous forum for discussing law school issues (such as admissions, firm offers, salary information, and grades)? - How anonymous is anonymous? Can the people who post be identified? - Should anonymous forums be moderated? By whom?" |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:47 PM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin These are the questions being asked, yet they uninvite rachmiel because they don't want the panel to be focused on AutoAdmit? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868964) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 10:45 PM Author: ebony death wish "Fertik?" Immer noch einer Familienname Schreibfehler. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7868946) |
|
Date: April 3rd, 2007 11:18 PM Author: soul-stirring turdskin international law enforcement agency probably right (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7869128) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 3:19 PM Author: Aromatic corner yiddish:german::ebonics:english (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7872710) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 3:18 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7872701) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 8:22 PM Author: Well-lubricated Glassy Shrine This is pretty sad. One of the law students helping to organize the panel on anonymous autoadmit speech is one of the worst autoadmit offenders.
|
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 8:28 PM Author: Turquoise learning disabled site private investor lol @ "organize" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7874582) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 8:37 PM Author: soul-stirring turdskin international law enforcement agency omg pics? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7874642) |
|
Date: April 4th, 2007 8:41 PM Author: greedy vigorous native you're a dirty tease (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7874658) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 1:50 AM Author: hateful pistol Is it me? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7876730) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 9:03 PM Author: Well-lubricated Glassy Shrine Depends...are you ME? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7881134) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 2:09 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin Please don't blame the student organizers for the uninviting. They (or at least the person we were in contact with) chose not to uninvite, but then the administration overruled them three days before the panel. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7876822) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 2:11 AM Author: nighttime school cafeteria Someone should ask what role the administration outside the berkman center played in influencing who could and couldn't attend the panel. that'd be more illustrative of the politics surrounding this thing than any stupid speech fertik could make. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7876840) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 2:14 AM Author: naked unholy abode foreskin It was the Dean of Students office who did the uninviting, or at least that's where the email we got came from. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7876847) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:13 PM Author: Useless talented half-breed Subject: Recording of tonight's HARVARD panel on AutoAdmit. For anyone who can't wait, to download a recording of tonight's panel at Harvard Law School on AutoAdmit, click: http://autoadmitcritic.wordpress.com . (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7881579) |
|
Date: April 5th, 2007 10:47 PM Author: Useless talented half-breed Subject: Recording of Harvard panel I put the recording up on esnips.com, where you can listen in your browser. The updated link is here: http://autoadmitcritic.wordpress.com. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7881771) |
|
Date: April 6th, 2007 2:08 AM Author: bearded juggernaut Xoxo is the most exciting site on the net: http://s6.fileho.com/download3/878f4e751981_11louicukld4ber3/Most-Exciting.mp3 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7883310) |
|
Date: April 6th, 2007 2:15 AM Author: buff cerebral pocket flask Wow. I see why GTO and Rach were disinvited. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#7883337) |
|
Date: April 7th, 2007 1:33 AM Author: Canary Fragrant Legal Warrant i don't. its clear no one knew any facts and that fertik chose them selectively.
that said, its awesome that he mentioned my schtick.
BTW, its amazing that fertik realizes that GTO is ok with me, even though chancemeeting and vector think GTO is out to get me bc he's pissed. fact is, even if GTO and i arent 'best friends forever', theres a working agreement there and he's cool with me.
i think this settles the issue of whether GTO would 'out' me... and the answer is, no. GTO has done a good job handling this and staying true to his word. if certain xoxo posters dont get this and just hate the pauliewalnuts schtick, hey, more power to them... |
|
Date: April 6th, 2007 9:19 PM Author: heady pontificating yarmulke university http://media.www.hlrecord.org/media/storage/paper609/news/2004/11/04/Etc/Fenno-795548-page3.shtml
While reading the letter in the Pound hallway, Fenno passed by the wall of professors\' portraits. Curiously, he noticed that Professor Tribe\'s frame was missing. That\'s odd, thought Fenno. Where did it go? He continued walking down the hall. As he passed by a dimly lit Pound 102, he heard strange noises. A sucking sound, or slurping, or something like that. Peering through the door window, Fenno made out the figures of two of the co-authors of the Crimson letter, Michael Fertik and Dan Richenthal. Fertik was holding something up close to his face. It appeared to be the missing Tribe portrait.
\"Mmmm... yeah. Just like that. That\'s how I\'d do it.\" Fertik mused dreamily.
Richenthal grabbed the portrait from him. \"No way,\" he responded. \"If I got the chance, I\'d do it like this.\" With that, he moved his face toward the frame and planted his lips softly on the glass. \"Yeah... that\'s nice.\" His mouth roved the portrait glass sensually. \"Mmmm. Good stuff,\" Richenthal murmured delicately. Fenno thought he glimpsed a little tongue.
Fenno just couldn\'t let this opportunity go to waste. He swung open the door and called out to the two 3Ls. \"Hey fellas! What\'s up?\"
Fertik and Richenthal turned toward Fenno, horrified. Richenthal dropped the portrait, which crashed to the ground. Fenno hadn\'t seen Richenthal in quite a while; he wondered what he\'d been up to. It certainly wasn\'t charm school.
\"Er, uh, hey Fenno! Um, what are you doing here? I thought you had con law right now.\"
\"I cut out for a little while... say, guys, great letter to the Crimson. Really made a good point.\"
Fertik\'s face lit up. \"You think?\"
Replied Fenno, \"No, of course not, you sniveling mass of back hair. All you did was basically admit that Tribe plagiarized, but then said it\'s okay as long as the guy is admired by others. I mean, what the fuck?
\"You don\'t get it, Fenno,\" replied Fertik. \"It\'s all about the context--\"
\"Oh, bullshit, it\'s all about the context. You either copied or you didn\'t. And by the way, did it really take seven people to write a four-paragraph letter? Did you actually divide up the twelve sentences, or were five of you there just to pat each other on the back?\"
Retorted Richenthal, \"Suck it, Fenno!\"
\"From the looks of it, you seem to be taking care of that,\" Fenno answered coolly. \"By the way, be sure to wipe down those smudges before you put the frame back up. You don\'t want to leave a mark.\" And with that, he headed out of the room.
Fenno found himself back in the hall. He figured he should probably get back to Fried\'s class. Outside, the skies were already pitch dark, and the wind looked to have picked up. Rain was threatening. Gotta love those Cambridge falls, thought Fenno. Or was it winter already? Sometimes it was just too hard to tell.
|
|
Date: April 29th, 2007 3:46 PM Author: twinkling tanning salon good times bump (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#8029938) |
|
Date: February 6th, 2008 12:27 AM Author: drab sanctuary kitty cat http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=608398&mc=54&forum_id=2 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=606551&forum_id=2Reputation#9278665) |